Quote of the day

“I find economics increasingly satisfactory, and I think I am rather good at it.”– John Maynard Keynes

Friday, 15 March 2024

Another look at trade and China's role

 

Xi Jinping risks setting off another trade war

Why Western politicians should prepare for a second “China shock”

Steel workers on an assembly line at the steel production workshop in Huai’an, China.
image: getty images
|singapore
Listen to this story.
 Enjoy more audio and podcasts on iOS or Android.

China’s leaders are obsessed with lithium-ion batteries, electric cars and solar panels. These sorts of technologies will, Xi Jinping has proclaimed, become “pillars of the economy”. He is spending big to ensure this happens—meaning, in the years to come, that his ambitions will be felt across the world. A manufacturing export boom could very well lead to a trade war.

Mr Xi’s manufacturing obsession is explained by the need to offset China’s property slump, which is dragging on economic growth. Sales by the country’s 100 largest real-estate developers fell by 17% in 2023, and overall investment in residential buildings dropped by 8%. After a decade in which capital spending on property outstripped economic growth, officials now hope that manufacturing can pick up the slack. State-owned banks—corporate China’s main source of financing—are funnelling cash to industrial firms. In return for an extension of pandemic-era tax breaks and carve-outs for green industries, exporters in powerhouse provinces have been told to expand production. During the first 11 months of 2023 capital spending on smelting metals, manufacturing vehicles and making electrical equipment rose by 10%, 18% and 34%, respectively, compared with the same period in 2022.

Such developments will be prompting flashbacks among veteran Western policymakers. China’s rise was accompanied by an epochal shift in global trade. In the decade that followed the country’s accession to the World Trade Organisation in 2001, its exports rose by more than 460%. China became the number-one target for accusations of dumping—selling goods abroad at lower prices than at home—in industries including chemicals, metals and textiles. Although low-cost goods were great news for consumers, they were less welcome for some rich-world industrial workers. It later became fashionable to blame the “China shock”, which led to lay-offs in affected industrial areas, for contributing to Donald Trump’s electoral victory in 2016.

The coming manufacturing boom could be even larger, given the sheer scale of the Chinese economy, which has doubled in size over the past decade. Michael Pettis of Peking University notes that even if China simply were to maintain the current size of its manufacturing sector, which accounts for 28% of gdp, and were to achieve its target of 4-5% gdp growth over the next decade, its share of global manufacturing output would rise from 31% to 36%. If Mr Xi’s ambitions are fulfilled, the increase will be bigger still.

China’s capital investment, which is more than double America’s as a share of gdp, is funded by its thrifty households and their saving piles. During earlier manufacturing booms, some observers had expected the country’s consumers to use these savings to splurge on goods, only to be proved wrong. Consumers are likely to continue to prefer saving to spending. In 2023 private consumption rose by 10%, rebounding from a grim 2022. But most analysts now expect much slower overall growth, owing to tumult in the property market and the government’s wariness about borrowing to support household incomes. In the absence of higher private consumption, “policymakers would need to bring the economy down much faster to correct overcapacity”, says Alicia Garcia-Herrero of Natixis, a bank. “It would have to grow at 3-4%, not 5%.” Alternatively, if the higher rate of growth is to be sustained, more goods will have to be sold abroad.

image: the economist

It will help that they are getting cheaper—as can be seen in the steel market, which is vital for China’s car and renewable industries. Early last year investors expected output to fall, as Chinese construction flagged. Instead, in a remarkable feat, the country’s steel giants produced more metal even as the property industry suffered. Steel mills, which have access to cheap capital, are willing to take considerable losses in order to preserve market share.

As a result, industrial prices fell by 2% in the first 11 months of 2023, and profits by 4%. In 2012, during a previous era of manufacturing stimulus, overcapacity meant that the profit on a couple of tonnes of steel “was just about enough to buy a lollipop”, according to Yu Yongding, an economist. Many producers are now heading for a similar situation. An employee at a supplier in Shanghai estimates that some are losing about 350 yuan ($50) on each tonne of steel reinforcement they sell. Meanwhile, renewable firms, such as longi, the world’s largest solar-equipment manufacturer, and Goldwind, a wind-turbine maker, are also suffering. Both reported sharply lower profits in the third quarter of 2023.

image: the economist

It is not only China’s industrial prices that are falling—the country’s currency is, too. The yuan is down by 9% on a trade-weighted basis since its peak in 2022, meaning that overseas competitors face a double whammy. At the same time, Western politicians are more willing to fight on behalf of domestic firms than during the last era of Chinese manufacturing stimulus. Attitudes towards Chinese exports have hardened. Western countries are both more protective of their domestic industrial bases and more sceptical that China will eventually become a market economy.

Frictions are already starting to develop. In November Britain launched a probe into Chinese excavators, after jcb, a local firm, alleged that Chinese rivals were flooding the market with cut-price machines. The eu is conducting an anti-subsidy probe into Chinese electric vehicles and an anti-dumping probe into Chinese biodiesel. The Biden administration has asked the eu to tax Chinese goods, offering to drop American tariffs on European steel in return. On January 5th China decided to hit Europe where it hurts, announcing an anti-dumping investigation into brandy.

And it is not just the rich world that is getting angry. In September India imposed fresh anti-dumping duties on Chinese steel; in December it introduced new duties on industrial laser machines. Indeed, almost all the anti-dumping investigations that India’s trade authorities are now conducting concern China. On the other side of the world, Mexico is in a tricky spot. It benefits from decisions by Chinese companies to move production in order to avoid American tariffs, but it also wants to avoid domestic markets being flooded by subsidised imports. It seems the latter is now taking precedence. In December the government announced an 80% tariff on some imports of Chinese steel.

China’s leadership has little room for manoeuvre. In December officials issued a statement calling industrial overcapacity, exacerbated by weak domestic demand, one of the biggest challenges facing the economy. Given the numerous other challenges facing the economy, they can hardly afford to alienate more of China’s trading partners with fights over dumping and subsidies. Unfortunately, the alternative—a new year with nothing to offset the property mess and lacklustre consumer spending—may be even less attractive. 

A look at "dumping" - Chinese EVs

 

Britain fires off warning over cheap Chinese car ‘dumping’

Transport Secretary threatens ‘robust’ sanctions amid fears low-cost models will flood Europe

Britain will use “robust” trade sanctions to prevent China from flooding the car market with cheap electric vehicles (EVs), the Transport Secretary has said.

Mark Harper issued the warning on Thursday when asked about the risk posed by Chinese brands pushing into Europe with new low-cost models.

He pointed to the post-Brexit trade remedies regime, which can levy tariffs on imports deemed to have unfair advantages, as a way to stop Chinese EVs from inundating Western markets.

The comments are the clearest indication yet that ministers are keen to crack down on incoming EVs from the Far East.

It is expected to fuel speculation that the Government will launch an investigation into claims that Chinese EVs have benefitted from significant state support, following similar investigations already underway in the European Union and the US.


Speaking at the SMMT Connected conference in London, Mr Harper said: “First of all, I understand why some people are concerned about that.

“The issue I think most people are concerned about, that our concern is about [is] cost and competitiveness.

“We have very robust measures in this country, with a trade remedies regime which deals with not just the car industry but all markets, about making sure we have fair international trade, and that we don’t have dumping or unfair subsidy.

“So I think we have a good legal structure. That is the structure that will make sure that competition is fair and that there’s a level playing field.”

Mr Harper said that he wanted as many manufacturers in the market as possible, but added: “The important thing is it’s a fair, competitive landscape.

“I know if the competition is fair, British manufacturers are absolutely at the table and we’ll be able to compete with anybody in the world both domestically, but also exporting technology around the world.”

The remarks are the first public acknowledgement by a minister that Britain could resort to trade tariffs if Chinese cars are found to have benefited from large state subsidies.

Since 2009, China’s central and local governments have subsidised domestic EV businesses to the tune of $100bn (£78bn), according to a study by the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).

The claims have triggered an anti-subsidy investigation by the EU, which could put pressure on the UK government to act if it is found that Chinese brands have received an unfair advantage.

Meanwhile, President Joe Biden’s administration in the US has branded Chinese EVs a risk to national security and threatened to hit them with punishing restrictions.

So far, the UK government has insisted it has not begun any investigation of its own and that such a move would only be triggered by a formal complaint from carmakers.

But it was reported last month that the Department for Business and Trade had begun preparations and was examining various options.

Meanwhile, Giorgia Meloni, the Italian prime minister, is wooing Chinese electric carmaker Chery Automobiles amid an ongoing war with national champion Stellantis.

Ms Meloni’s government has been holding talks with the state-owned group, China’s third-largest carmaker, about setting up a European production plant as the country pushes to hit ambitious production targets.

Chinese producers BYD and Great Wall Motor have also been sounded out about the plan, with Chery emerging as the leading candidate to open a new factory, Reuters reported.

Chery focuses on electric vehicles (EVs) and has previously indicated plans to open a plant in the UK during the next decade.

Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni
Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni attacked Stellantis, saying a car being sold as an 'Italian jewel' must be made in the country CREDIT: KENZO TRIBOUILLARD

Italy is aiming to increase annual vehicle production from 800,000 vehicles per year to 1.3 million. Its government wants Stellantis, the only carmaker left in Italy, to help hit the target. The group has been urged to increase production to one million vehicles per year from 750,000.

However, this has led to tensions between the two sides. Earlier this year Ms Meloni attacked Stellantis, saying a car being sold as an “Italian jewel” must be made in the country.

Stellantis is controlled by Italy’s Agnelli family, which founded Fiat, but Meloni loyalists fear too much car production is moving overseas.

The company has faced criticism from Ms Meloni for ditching its Italian roots and listing shares in New York.

Luring Chery to Italy could help build another 300,000 cars, helping the government hit the 1.3 million target. Chery was contacted for comment.

Separately, industry chiefs warned on Thursday that Britain is falling behind Europe and the US on driverless cars as slow progress on regulation forces start-ups to deploy their technology abroad.

Mike Hawes, chief executive of the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT), on Thursday urged MPs to swiftly pass new laws legalising fully autonomous vehicles on the road, noting that other Western governments had already done so.

The Automated Vehicles Bill was announced in the King’s Speech in November, having first been mooted in 2018. It is currently working its way through Parliament.

Thursday, 14 March 2024

International trade & the WTO - short piece for context

 

World trade cop needs reform

Editorial
The Washington Post

The World Trade Organisation (WTO) is “sliding towards uselessness”, says The Washington Post. At its recent meeting, the WTO’s 164 members failed to make progress on “small yet crucial” issues, such as ending subsidies to fisheries that endanger the world’s fish stocks. Unless Washington “recovers its commitment to a rules-based trading system”, the organisation it “painstakingly” helped to build will be an irrelevance when it comes to global challenges such as artificial intelligence and climate change, both of which require international coordination. Far from any kind of coordination, rising tension between the US and China has “decimated” the WTO and rule flouting and unilateral decision-making is “becoming commonplace”. “The long-term cost of the world fragmenting into rival trading blocs” could amount to a “massive 7% of global economic output”. The WTO needs reform. It requires a better system to resolve trade disputes, a more nimble set-up so that groups of countries can make progress without “universal consensus”, and it must address China’s repeated attempts to tip the playing field in its favour. But abandoning it would be a “grave mistake”. The world needs a “multinational cop”.

Wednesday, 13 March 2024

I love a bit of innovation - even if it is hard to believe:

 

Nuclear fusion for the grid is coming much sooner than you think

Britain is on the brink of striking gold in the race for limitless energy

nuclear fusion
The game-changing fusion technology now in operation scarcely existed 10 years ago CREDIT: Commonwealth Fusion Systems

Commercial nuclear fusion has gone from science fiction to science fact in less than a decade. Even well-informed members of the West’s political class are mostly unaware of the quantum leap in superconductors, lasers, and advanced materials suddenly changing the economics of fusion power.

Britain’s First Light Fusion announced last week that it had broken the world record for pressure at the Sandia National Laboratories in the US, pushing the boundary to 1.85 terapascal, five times the pressure at the core of the Earth.

Days earlier, a clutch of peer-reviewed papers confirmed that Commonwealth Fusion Systems near Boston had broken the world record for a large-scale magnet with a field strength of 20 tesla using the latest high-temperature superconducting technology. This exceeds the threshold necessary for producing net energy, or a “Q factor”, above 1.0.

“Overnight, it basically changed the cost per watt of a fusion reactor by a factor of almost 40,” said Professor Dennis Whyte, plasma doyen at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). The March edition of the IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity published six papers ratifying different aspects of the technology.

The magnets are used to fuse hydrogen isotopes by squeezing super hot plasma inside a tokamak device. The temperature must be ten times hotter than the surface of the sun in order to replicate solar fusion because the Earth’s magnetic field is that much weaker.

The “old” low-temperature magnets are made of niobium alloys operating near absolute zero at -270C. The new magnets lift the temperature from 4 kelvins to 20 kelvins using rare earth barium copper oxide (ReBCO) with a radical new design. They combine superconductivity with extreme magnetic power. This leverages a “multiple order-of-magnitude increase” in fusion capability.

Commonwealth’s chief executive, Bob Mumgaard, told me the game-changing technology scarcely existed 10 years ago, and was still in its infancy five years ago. “The breakthrough is in superconductors. Much stronger magnets mean that we can build a plant that is 40 times smaller,” he said.

It is time to drop the old joke that fusion is 30 years away, and always will be. A poll at the International Atomic Energy Agency’s forum in London found that 65pc of insiders think fusion will generate electricity for the grid at viable cost by 2035, and 90pc by 2040.

The Washington-based Fusion Industry Association says four of its members think they can do it by 2030. If the industry is anywhere close to being right, we need to rethink all our energy assumptions. Britain’s planned gas plants are rendered obsolescent almost before they are built.

In late December, China launched its own fusion consortium, combining its top universities and state industries in an Apollo-style national endeavour. “Controlled nuclear fusion is the only direction for future energy,” said the State Council. This is the new front in the technology arms race.

The world’s long-running $20bn ITER research project, a consortium of the US, Japan, Europe, China, and Russia, looks ever more like a beached whale in this contest. It has collected valuable science over the decades but has been dogged by geopolitics and delays, and has never produced more energy than it put in, unlike the Lawrence Livermore lab in the US using the rival technology of inertial fusion.

The baton has passed to tech tycoons in a hurry. Commonwealth Fusion, a spin-off from MIT’s Plasma Science and Fusion Centre, is backed by Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, and Sir Richard Branson. It aims to produce its first plasma next year and reach a steady Q factor of 10 by the late 2020s, the energy target for commercial take-off.

Dr Mumgaard said Commonwealth is eyeing costs of $60-80 MWh with scale, undercutting the 24/7 cost of intermittent renewables paired gas peaker plants or with energy storage in most places. “It might be even lower. We don’t use uranium. There is no risk of melt-downs,” he said.

Regulators in the UK and the US plan to treat fusion plants like hospitals, since they use tiny amounts of deuterium-tritium. Radioactive release is nothing like a uranium fission reactor. This means they can be built almost anywhere and rolled out fast.

Britain is going gangbusters on all fronts, a legacy of ITER’s Joint European Torus project at Culham, but also a feat of leadership. “Of all the countries in the world, the UK is most aggressively pursuing fusion power,” said American scientists Matthew Moynihan and Alfred Bortz, co-authors of Fusion’s Promise.

They said the UK Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) under Sir Ian Chapman had done a masterful job in creating the Fusion Cluster and the £650m Fusion Futures Programme, accelerating the move from pure research to megawatts for the grid. “All this work has made the UK the technical leader in the race to fusion power,” they said.

Tokamak Energy near Oxford is a pioneer of the new ReBCO magnet technology, and may be sitting on priceless intellectual property.

The UKAEA is building its own tokamak on the site of an old coal-fired plant in Nottinghamshire, with a spherical design that has never been tried before but promises to slash costs.

England hosts three world-class fusion start-ups spanning the two key rival technologies.

First Light leads in inertial fusion. Two others are developing magnetic fusion: Tokamak Energy and Canada’s General Fusion, which is locating its demonstration plant at the Culham Campus, quite a coup for the Fusion Cluster. Any one of them has a chance of striking gold.

The allure of fusion is by now well understood. It generates four million times more energy than fossil power, without emitting CO2 or methane. It creates almost no long-term waste. Its main by-product is inert helium.

It uses almost no land, and little water, and can be made practically invisible. Unlike today’s fission, it produces industrial high-grade heat to help decarbonise glass, cement, steel, ammonia, hydrogen, etc. It runs continuously if you need it, or is dispatchable if you don’t.

The fuel is effectively limitless for thousands of years and can be obtained anywhere: deuterium from seawater, and tritium by breeding with small amounts of lithium. There is no risk of a runaway chain reaction. It does not use fissile materials and is useless for weapons.

Lev Artsimovich, the Polish-Russian father of the tokomak, was once asked when fusion would come of age. “When humanity really needs it,” he replied. So it is proving to be.