Quote of the day

“I find economics increasingly satisfactory, and I think I am rather good at it.”– John Maynard Keynes
Showing posts with label IHT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IHT. Show all posts

Sunday, 19 January 2025

Laffer Curve

 There must be a new rule that says when an article ends with a quote from the Treasury, the spokesperson knows they are defending the indefensible:

Labour’s tax plans trigger exodus of millionaires from UK

Since the general election was called one dollar millionaire has left Britain every 45 minutes
a woman holding a red briefcase that says ' chancellor of the exchequer ' on it
Rachel Reeves is facing calls to reverse the Treasury’s crackdown on non-domiciled residents
JUSTIN TALLIS/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

A record number of millionaires have left Britain since Sir Keir Starmer came to power and there is growing concern that Labour’s tax plans are exiling international investors and damaging the economy.

The Treasury is facing calls to reverse its crackdown on non-domiciled residents as the scale of the exodus becomes clear.

Tax advisers also report that growing numbers of British entrepreneurs are prepared to leave the country after the tax rises announced in the autumn budget.

In total Britain lost a net 10,800 millionaires to migration last year, a 157 per cent increase on 2023, meaning it lost more wealthy residents than any other country except China. The actual number that moved out is even higher because the net figure also takes into account the millionaires who arrived in the UK.

The outflow, mainly to other European countries such as Italy and Switzerland, as well as the United Arab Emirates, was especially large among the UK’s richest residents. Some 78 centi-millionaires and 12 billionaires left the country last year.

The figures were compiled by New World Wealth, the global analytics firm, and investment migration advisors Henley & Partners, which looked at high net-worth individuals with liquid assets of more than $1 million (£821,500). They show that the exodus accelerated after the general election was called. Since that moment one dollar millionaire has left Britain every 45 minutes.

Aerial view of the Abu Dhabi skyline.
Most UK-based non-doms have moved to Switzerland, Italy and, above, the United Arab Emirates
EXTREME PHOTOGRAPHER/GETTY IMAGES

In 2023, HM Revenue & Customs said there were 74,000 non-doms in the UK, and 37,800 of them who have lived in the UK for at least seven years paid a £30,000 annual fee to keep their offshore income and gains sheltered from the taxman.

However, from April, Labour will abolish this centuries-old regime, replacing it with a much less generous residence-based system that will also subject current non-doms’ overseas assets to UK inheritance tax (IHT) for the first time.

• The jewellers and estate agents hit by wealthy quitting Britain

A survey of more than 700 non-doms or their tax advisers by Oxford Economics found that nearly two thirds are planning to leave the UK or considering doing so because of the changes. Most said the principal motivation was the introduction of IHT on their world wide assets, while many other jurisdictions do not levy the tax at all or having more generous reliefs.

Charlie Mullins in Malaga, Spain.
Charlie Mullins, the founder of Pimlico Plumbers, has moved to Spain

The Office for Budgetary Responsibility (OBR) estimates that between 12 and 25 per cent of non-doms will go. If a quarter do leave it could have a significant impact on the economy but also indirectly tax revenues and philanthropy.

The survey found that each non-dom paid an average of £800,000 of VAT in the last tax year, and £890,000 in stamp duty over the previous five years. They have also invested an average of £118 million in the UK since arriving and given an average of £5.9 million to good causes.

‘Monumental self-harm’

The Treasury predicts that Labour’s plan to end the non-dom regime will raise £2.5 billion a year over the next five years. But Oxford Economics says the plans will in fact cost the ­exchequer nearly £1 billion a year because so many non-doms will leave — and that is before the ­impact of lower VAT receipts and other taxes is included.

David Hawkins, of Foreign Investors for Britain, a group representing non-doms, described the government’s policy as “a monumental act of national self-harm”.

He said: “It appears that decisions have been made not based on the evidence but based on ideology. It’s a real worry because more and more people are leaving. And it’s businesses, jobs, investment, spending into the economy and tax take and philanthropy that are hit.”

The group is now working with the Institute of Directors and the British Chambers of Commerce to persuade ministers of the merits of designing “an internationally competitive offer” to overseas entrepreneurs.

Growing numbers of British entrepreneurs are looking at moving abroad. Henley & Partners says it handled a record number of applications from Britons seeking alternative citizenship and overseas residency rights last year. It said demand was up 57 per cent on 2023 and a “staggering” 580 percentage points higher than five years ago.

Stuart Wakeling, Managing Partner at Henley & Partners UK, believes there are a multitude of factors influencing entrepreneurs to leave, such as the bad weather and fears over crime, but that tax remained the biggest motivation.

Uma Thurman and Christian Angermayer at the Time100 Gala.
Christian Angermayer, the German technology entrepreneur, left Britain last year for Switzerland
ANGELA WEISS/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

“Wealthy Britons are consistently telling us that they are becoming more and more disassociated with the country of their birth,” Ferrigno said. “They are realising that although a relocation brings about a significant change and upheaval to their lives, it is a change worth making. The wealthy are also becoming more and more aware that having a plan B, or additional residence or citizenship, is vital in an ever-changing world. Having all your eggs in one basket is risky and sometimes the grass can ultimately be greener elsewhere.”

Other firms have also noted the trend. Rachel De Souza, a private client tax partner at the accountancy firm RSM UK, said the “tables had turned” since October, with demand for relocation advice being driven by non-doms before the budget but also by British entrepreneurs afterwards.

She said: “In virtually all cases, these entrepreneurs are citing the budget announcements as the reason for seeking to move.”

Charlie Mullins, the founder of Pimlico Plumbing, is one of the entrepreneurs who has already left, having recently moved to Spain.

He said: “Britain is in trouble. I’m not going to blame Labour completely, the Tories also lost the plot, but Labour have made it worse. They’ve raised taxes, and added new employment laws like getting a contract from day one. It makes it hard to run a business.”

Other high profile business names have already left or are leaving, including Asif Aziz, the British real-estate investor, who has relocated to Abu Dhabi, and Christian Angermayer, the German technology entrepreneur who quit Britain last year for Switzerland.

Alan Howard, the British hedge fund billionaire, is also reported to be exploring a move to Geneva while Nassef Sawiris, the owner of Aston Villa, is thinking of relocating to the Middle East.

Portrait of Aron Landy, CEO of Brevan Howard.
Alan Howard
HOLLIE ADAMS/BLOOMBERG/GETTY IMAGES

The Adam Smith Institute estimates that by 2035, the non-dom reforms will make the economy £1.3 billion smaller than it would otherwise have been, which could lead to over 23,000 job losses by 2030.

Foreign Investors for Britain wants the Treasury to introduce a tiered tax regime that would charge non-doms a fixed fee depending on their wealth, starting at £200,000 a year for those with assets under £100 million, rising to £2 million a year for those with wealth above £500 million.

Oxford Economics believes this system would actually raise tax revenue for the Treasury.

Leslie Macleod Miller, the chief executive of Foreign Investors for Britain, described a tiered tax regime as a “compromise solution” that would “maintain the UK’s attractiveness to international investors while ensuring fair contributions to the public purse”.

“It’s not too late for the government to work with us on it,” he said.

In a statement, the Treasury said: “We are committed to tax reforms that are progressive and underpinned by fairness. It is right that those who can afford to, contribute their fair share to fix the foundations to provide stability and fund public services to drive growth.”

Monday, 28 October 2024

Sweden shows us what abolishing IHT might look like:

 

Sweden got rid of inheritance tax — why can’t we?

IHT can be devastating for families and it could soon become a lot more complicated

Johanna Noble
The Sunday Times

Inheritance tax: no other tax is more divisive. Those on one side say it is only fair to tax the rich, while others argue it’s a double taxation that harms hard-working families.

But what would it be like if we scrapped it?

Let’s turn our attention to Sweden, where I grew up, which 20 years ago waved goodbye to inheritance tax.

Before then there was a lot of debate around the subject, much like in the UK now, but to understand it you need to take a closer look at Swedish life.

By landmass it is the fifth largest country in Europe, but it has a population of only 10.6 million people, with 1.7 million residing in Stockholm, the capital.

There is plenty of countryside here, and this, combined with the Swedes’ love of nature, means many families have a house — known as a stuga — in the country or on one of the 30,000 islands that make up the archipelago. This is where people come together to celebrate Christmas, Easter and Midsummer. Grandparents, uncles, aunts and cousins gather with herring, snaps and green princess cake. And typically these houses were passed down from generation to generation.

But while many Swedes had property wealth, they did not have savings in the traditional sense. This meant inheritance tax could have a devastating impact. There were cases where a surviving spouse had to sell the family home or the stuga to afford a tax bill. This was especially true in coastal areas and other parts of the country where property values had soared.

• Why Rachel Reeves should reduce the tax-free lump sum

A report by Svenskt Naringsliv (Swedish Enterprise) said: “The burden was distributed unfairly, since the wealthiest taxpayers were often able to legally avoid it through tax planning, while low and middle-income taxpayers had no choice but to pay.”

It caused a lot of pain for not much money; by the time it was scrapped inheritance tax only generated about 0.15 per cent of the country’s GDP.

It also had dire consequences for the Swedish economy, sparking an exodus of wealthy entrepreneurs, such as the Ikea founder, Ingvar Kamprad, as there was no relief for family-run businesses, unlike in the UK.

Since abolishing inheritance tax, many business owners have returned to Sweden, which in turn has increased tax revenues (the wealth tax was also abolished in 2007).

One of the arguments for keeping inheritance tax in the UK is that it helps redistribute income fairly between generations — essentially freeing up housing.

However, it doesn’t really achieve this goal because the families most affected often find ways to circumvent it. The worst hit are often those who have suffered a tragedy — the untimely death of both parents, perhaps — and that seems a particularly cruel way to operate a tax system.

Before Sweden repealed inheritance tax, various exemptions and reliefs were experimented with, creating instead layers of complexity. It just didn’t work. Is Britain making the same mistakes?

On the eve of Labour’s first budget since 2010, it looks like the chancellor could fiddle with some of the allowances that save families billions of pounds a year — adding further complexity to complexity.
Inheritance tax cannot be viewed in isolation — it needs to be part of a much broader conversation about wealth and equality. In Sweden this debate is now in full swing.

• Loyal customers are still getting a raw deal on insurance

Despite the tax being scrapped, owning a stuga has actually got harder because property prices have kept on rising and wealth disparity has increased. If you’re not already wealthy, it has become near impossible to catch up.

The number of Swedes worth more than $1 million is on the rise, up from 467,000 in 2022 to 575,000 in 2023, according to the UBS Global Wealth report. For a land that prides itself on its equality, there are now growing disparities between rich and poor.

Here, the conversation around IHT continues and on Wednesday we’re likely to see more layers of rules added to the existing system. This will make it harder again for the average person to navigate, potentially catching families out. Meanwhile, the bigger questions around wealth and taxation remain unsolved.