Quote of the day

“I find economics increasingly satisfactory, and I think I am rather good at it.”– John Maynard Keynes
Showing posts with label economic growth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label economic growth. Show all posts

Monday, 10 March 2025

Can we mine our way to growth?

 

Britain cannot repeat its fracking mistake in the race for critical minerals

Whitehall must overcome its disgust at ‘dirty’ industries or risk missing out on a genuine industrial renaissance

Chief surveyor Allan Reynolds in South Crofty mine, near Camborne, Cornwall
South Crofty mine, near Camborne, Cornwall. The south-west county is home to a plentiful supply of lithium and tin Credit: Jay Williams

Sir Humphrey has learned to hold his nose. After decades of official disgust at mining, refining and petrochemicals, Whitehall is learning to love the dirty stuff again – the very things we need to defend ourselves and grow a modern economy.

The vibe shift is palpable in Westminster and reflected in the booming share prices of mining and defence companies. And about time, too. In a collective spasm of shame, we stopped digging up and working with the most vital materials of the modern world.

Our policy class considered these industries to be filthy, and at Davos, the elite toasted itself for its high standards of moral hygiene by making a new, cleaner, “weightless” world. But we were becoming strategically dependent on China for the basics of modern life.

“China has realised they can dominate the world,” says Jeremy Wrathall of Cornish Lithium, which opened a £15m demonstration plant last autumn, producing battery-grade lithium hydroxide for batteries as a by-product.

“Most of the West has been asleep at the wheel and China is now laughing all the way to the bank.”

Today, China controls the supply chains for many of these critical minerals, and in December, the PRC turned the screws further. “So, you want to hurt our semiconductor industry?” asked Beijing. “Well, get a load of this”.

It promptly blocked the United States from receiving any antimony, gallium or germanium. The message was clear: we can hurt you far more than you can hurt us, because only we have what you need, and you don’t.

Donald Trump’s indulgence of Vladimir Putin may look craven in European capitals, but it’s an entirely rational strategic response to China’s critical minerals monopolies.

The US can secure supplies from mineral-rich Russia and Ukraine to buy time for its own domestic refining to grow. If this peels Russia away from its alliance of convenience with Trump’s real enemy, China, then that’s a bonus.

But the British minerals story remains largely unappreciated. There’s lithium and tin in Cornwall, copper and gold in Northern Ireland, and nickel, cobalt and rare earths in Scotland.

“For modern warfare, you need metals such as lithium, caesium and rubidium for atomic clocks and night goggles,” says Wrathall. “We will be producing them in Cornwall as a by-product of what we do.”

Not long ago, Whitehall had one official dealing with critical minerals, now there are 50 across five departments. The paybacks for tiny strategic investments are huge: one £15m scheme captured £170m of investment.

“We’re starting to see the green shoots of an industrial foundation for which we can build a strong critical minerals supply chain,” says Jeff Townsend of the Critical Minerals Association. With an integrated petrochemicals centre and freeport on Teesside, the parts are falling into place.

Sky-high industrial energy prices need to come down, but what’s really missing is a wider sense of the genuine industrial renaissance before us.

We can not only dig the stuff up but apply science to it to create a higher-value product: what’s called “midstream processing”. And we can also start exploiting the resources that we think are there, but haven’t bothered to look for since the Macmillan era.

Re-shoring makes us more secure and enables us to apply scientific innovation to add value.

The UK Critical Mineral Intelligence Centre at the British Geological Survey has just published its critical assessments. Gavin Mudd, its director, explains how we export 2,000 tonnes a year of tungsten, a metal vital to our defence industry.

But we could export 15,000 tonnes thanks to ingenious new recovery techniques: that’s about 20pc of the world’s production.

Most tantalising of all are the untapped riches under our soil. We’re pretty sure they are there but haven’t had to look for them for decades.

“The last national geophysical surveys were done in the 1950s and 1960s,” explains Mudd.

Wratham has unearthed archives that even the British Geological Survey (BGS) didn’t know it had. And the strategic and commercial imperative is now urgent.

For example, monazite is an ore that is described as a “pathfinder” to rare earths, yielding cerium, lanthanum, and neodymium. It is incredibly expensive, and Wales is full of it. (It’s a common misconception that rare earth metals are rare.)

wales
Wales is full of monazite, an ore described as a ‘pathfinder’ to rare earths

But we haven’t tried to assess those monazite resource deposits for more than 30 years. Resourcing the geologists at the BGS could be the smartest investment any government makes, for who knows what else they will find.

So many times, this column often rues, the UK has found itself with a winning lottery ticket only to throw it away.

For example, in 2013 fracking was popular across the country, particularly in communities that stood to benefit from it. However, a campaign was then launched equating the process to “tiny explosions”, a highly misleading description of spraying rocks with water.

This activated the environmentalists, and politicians got nervous. The Colvile-Wolf authored Conservative Manifesto of 2019 killed shale gas for a decade.

The revulsion against mining and industry culminated in Boris Johnson’s speech to the United Nations in 2021, which talked about the derangement of the “natural order”.

We can’t afford to make that mistake again – to capitulate to wild, bourgeoisie fears of getting dirty, and using our natural riches.

What we have is better than gold.

Friday, 24 January 2025

UK's (and Europe's) problems in a nutshell

 Anything that doesn't address the core is just tinkering:


My monologue on today’s The Times at One 1pm, live from New York: It’s only the start of the third full day of the new Trump administration but already we can see what an economic and business threat it poses to an ailing Europe, including the UK.  And it’s about much more than tariffs. Trump aims to consolidate America’s economic supremacy with lower taxes, cheaper energy, much less regulation.  It’s worth noting that taxes in Europe and the UK are already much higher than in America, energy is much more expensive and business far more highly regulated. That explains why America has come out of the pandemic downturn far more robustly than Europe.  Trump now wants to go faster on all three fronts, so that America pulls even further ahead of Europe than it already is.  As Europe continues to stagnate, America is poised to grow more. Multi-billion dollar investments in AI and other cutting edge technologies are being announced, reinforcing America’s clear technological lead.  It’s often thought high-tech business doesn’t consume as much power as the old heavy industries. You couldn’t be more wrong.  Data centres are fierce consumers of electricity, which is why Trump wants even cheaper energy — and why Europe and the UK, which has the highest electricity costs in the world, are struggling to attract these data centres.  Heavy industry in Europe and the UK is still being hollowed out. Not enough new stuff is replacing it.  In the UK alone chemical production is down 38% in just the past three years, cement production down 40%, electrical equipment down 50%. Either they close down because energy costs mean they can’t compete or they flee across the Atlantic, where energy costs are far cheaper.  It’s happening all across Europe.  Yet nobody in Europe is doing anything about it.  Far from cutting red tape, Brussels boasts, absurdly, that the EU is a regulatory superpower. Good luck with getting rich on that.  Far from cutting taxes, almost everywhere in Europe they are being increased, even though they’re already at record levels.  And far from reducing energy prices they continue to rise as Europe puts the huge cost of going for green energy generation onto everybody’s fuel bills.  It’s a hat trick of self-harm which Trump has spotted and intends to exploit.  In Britain Keir Starmer manfully struggles against all the legal constraints on growth and development, many exploited by his legal friends who’ve grown rich on lawfare.  He’s for the builders not the blockers, he claims. Which is good news. But I’d put my money on the blockers winning.  In Davos Rachel Reeves says she’ll look again at the tax regime for non-doms now that 11,000 millionaires and multi-millionaires left Britain in the past year alone to escape her high taxes. I suspect it’s too late to woo them back.  The punk left will say good riddance to them. They don't realise it’s Britain’s tax base walking out the door. Contrary to populist belief, our revenue base is hugely dependent on high earners. The top 1% of earners account for 30% of income tax revenues. The top 0.1% pay over 10% of income tax revenues.  If they go, everybody else will have to pay more tax.  Few in Britain realise this which is why wealth-destroying policies are so popular. It’s not a mistake made here in America, which is prepared to welcome companies escaping Europe’s anti-business climate and the high-earning, tax paying wealth creators that come with them.  By the end of this decade US business will likely be more dominant than ever. And Europe, Britain included, even more of a backwater. For the moment at least, there is nothing on the horizon to change that gloomy prognosis.

Thursday, 29 February 2024

Some ideas to consider (for the Budget Challenge final)

 I do mean consider - the writer loves to challenge the consensus but be wary of lifting anything wholesale; it is the general drift that is relevant:


The ‘greedy good’ are destroying Britain’s economy

Liz Truss is right – wokeonomics is destroying the West

Britain's former Prime Minister Liz Truss speaks at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC)
Former PM claims the establishment does not want things to change because it benefits from the status quo CREDIT: Amanda Andrade-Rhoades/Reuters

The Office for Budget Responsibility and the Bank of England were against her. The quangos were intent on sabotaging her plans. And civil service set itself against her plans, as did the IMF and even US President Joe Biden.

Liz Truss did not mince her words in her speech to the CPAC in the United States this week, blaming the “deep state” for blocking her attempt to drag the British economy out of stagnation. 

Sure, Truss bears part of the blame for her own failure. The timing and presentation of the mini-Budget, and more pertinently the huge energy bills support package, gave financial markets fright. But she is also on to something.

The “wokenomics” she called out in her speech is fatally undermining the economy. Until we find a way to fix that, we will never get back to the 2pc-plus growth rates we surely need if we are to have any hope of maintaining our standard of living. 

It was a more sympathetic audience than one she is likely to find in the UK anymore. In her speech in Maryland, Truss took apart the forces that, in her view, blew up her short Premiership. 

“There’s a whole bunch of people – and I describe them as the economic establishment – who fundamentally don’t want the status quo to change because they’re doing quite fine out of it. They don’t really care about the prospects of the average person in Britain and they didn’t want things to change and they didn’t want that power taken away.” 

In short, the lesson she has learnt from her short time in office is that the “deep state”, as the Americans call it, was so horrified by the assault on its privileges that it was actively working to undermine her.

True, it might be self-serving, and the reality may be more nuanced, but in fact Truss is making a valid point. 

In the 18 months since spineless Tory backbenchers evicted her from office, her fundamental point about Britain’s miserable growth rate has become more and more glaringly obvious to everyone. 

The idea that simply stabilising the economy with tax rises to balance the books would restore growth has been exposed as a complete sham. Instead we have destroyed incentives with huge increases in tax rates, but we have still collapsed into a recession, with a shrinking labour force, and miserable levels of investment. 

With an economy that is now incapable of any meaningful expansion, we are trapped in a doom loop of rising taxes, huge deficits, rising welfare bills, and stagnant real wages. 

When Labour takes power, as it inevitably will, that will become even more entrenched. It is hard to see that we would have been much worse off if we had stuck to the Truss growth plan from the Autumn of 2022, even if sterling was a lot lower against the dollar. At least by now, there might have been some glimmers of a revival.  

The core point is this. There is an economic establishment committed to “wokenomics” that runs from the civil service, to the major corporations, to quangos and think tanks, and takes in central banks and, perhaps surprisingly, the financial markets as well. Collectivism dominates all of those institutions. 

We can see it in the central banks, not least the Bank of England, that printed vast quantities of money and slashed interest rates, inflating asset bubbles while ignoring their basic duty to regulate the markets effectively. 

We can see it in the fiscal watchdogs that are now largely in charge of policy despite their abysmal record on forecasting any further than lunchtime, and which refuse to acknowledge that tax cuts can stimulate growth. 

We can see it as well in the think tanks that constantly argue for higher and more complex taxes without ever acknowledging that it might be the money that the state already takes out of people’s pockets that is destroying incentives and growth. 

It has infected the private sector just as seriously as the public. The major corporations that dominate the FTSE 100, driven by activists and “environmental, social and governance” (ESG) rule books and targets, seem now to be more focused on political activism than on building new factories, launching new products, or delivering better returns for their shareholders. 

In return, the state increasingly shelters them from competition, labelling it as “unfair” and protecting the quasi-monopoly profits that allow executives to award themselves huge pay packets without any of the entrepreneurship or innovation that might justify those rewards. 

And the financial markets, dominated by banks and brokers that are dependent on central bank decisions for cheap financing, and make most of their money financing vast state deficits, impose ESG standards on any companies that risk defying them. Meanwhile they dismiss tax cuts as “unfunded” and “unsustainable” and sell the currency of any government that tries to break away from the suffocating big state, high regulation consensus. 

It is a toxic mix, and one that now makes any form of genuine expansion more or less impossible, especially for an ageing developed country with a huge welfare state to support such as Britain. 

At a certain point the UK will have to take on this anti-growth coalition. For now, it remains in the ascendancy, and over the coming five years the Starmer government will make it ever more powerful. 

It shouldn’t be impossible to challenge that, but it will mean replacing much of the upper ranks of the civil service, stripping quangos such as the OBR of their power, reforming a moribund central bank, and stopping activist lawyers and judges from blocking developments, while backing entrepreneurs and disrupting markets through deregulation. 

Until that happens, however, we will be stuck with pitiful growth and rising taxes – and nothing is going to change that simple fact.