Quote of the day

“I find economics increasingly satisfactory, and I think I am rather good at it.”– John Maynard Keynes

Sunday, 15 March 2015

A kind view of deflation

Essential for A2s, useful for AS; at its core is the idea that the impact on debt is only important if income is falling - not a particularly outlandish idea, we learnt that in class. What is useful is the detail it contains about how the current deflation is actually beneficial for growth - although I (personally) think there is considerable danger ahead, and what starts well can end up bad:

Read more at http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/europe-deflation-good-news-by-daniel-gros-2015-03#uOPwA6DKDgsCoc2C.99


 

Why Deflation is Good News for Europe


BRUSSELS – In today's global economy, there is no price as important as that of crude oil. More than 80 million barrels are produced (and consumed) daily, and a large part of that output is traded internationally. Thus, the sharp fall in the crude-oil price – from about $110 last year to around $60 today – is yielding hundreds of billions of dollars in savings for oil importers. For the European Union and the United States, the gain from that decline is worth about 2-3% of GDP.
For Europe, the benefits of cheap oil might grow over time, because long-term gas-supply contracts are to a significant degree indexed to the oil price. This represents another advantage for Europe, where prices for natural gas were, until recently, several times higher than in the US, which had been benefiting from lower-cost shale energy.
But many observers have argued that cheap oil also has a downside, because it exacerbates deflationary tendencies in the advanced countries, which already seem to be mired in a low-growth trap. The sharp fall in oil prices, according to this view, will make it even harder for these countries' central banks to achieve the 2% annual inflation rate that most have targeted in fulfilling their price-stability mandate.
The eurozone, in particular, seems to be in danger, as prices are now falling for the first time since 2009. This deflation is bad, it is argued, because it makes it harder for debtors, especially in the troubled economies of the eurozone's periphery (Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, and Spain), to pay what they owe.
But this fear is unfounded, because it is based on a misunderstanding. What matters for debt-service capacity is the debtors' income, not the general price level.
As oil prices fall, households' real (inflation-adjusted) income should rise, because they do not have to spend as much on fuel and heating. Lower oil prices make life easier, not harder, for highly indebted households in the US or the eurozone periphery. Falling consumer prices should thus be viewed as a good sign.
Most manufacturing enterprises will also benefit from lower energy costs, improving their ability to service their debts. This, too, is particularly relevant in the eurozone periphery, where the non-financial sector accumulated too much debt during the credit boom that preceded the 2008 global financial crisis. Moreover, though most of the savings implied by lower energy costs might initially show up in higher profits, over time, competition will force companies to pass on some of these windfall gains in the form of lower prices or higher wages.
This is another important consequence of cheap oil: lower prices make it more difficult to judge the point at which wage pressure becomes inflationary. Because wages can increase to a greater extent without fueling inflation, the US Federal Reserve Board might be inclined to delay hiking interest rates, which it is now widely expected to do this summer.
Public finances should also benefit from the deflation engendered by lower oil prices. Government revenues depend on the value of domestic output, not only consumption. Though lower oil prices depress consumer prices, they should boost production and overall GDP.
Absent large price changes for raw materials, the consumer price index evolves along with the GDP deflator (the price deflator for the entire economy). But that will not be true this year, because consumer prices are falling, whereas the GDP deflator (and nominal GDP) is still increasing. This should lead to solid government revenues, which is good news for highly indebted governments throughout the industrialized world, but particularly for the eurozone periphery.
The fall in (consumer) prices that the eurozone currently is experiencing should thus be seen as a positive development for all energy importers. The eurozone periphery, in particular, can look forward to an ideal combination of low interest rates, a favorable euro exchange rate, and a boost in real incomes as a result of cheap oil. In a deflationary environment, lower oil prices appear to make it more difficult for the European Central Bank to achieve its target of an inflation rate close to 2%. In reality, lower oil prices represent a boon for Europe – especially for its most beleaguered nations.




Short article with quick update on prospects for BRICs

Good for context:

  Broken BRICs: A Shifting Center Of Gravity Among The Emerging Market Giants Mar. 15, 2015 

 BRICs: Strong, solid, steadfast, quite literally the building blocks of growth. 

First coined by Goldman Sachs' Jim O'Neill in 2001, the umbrella term for the major emerging market economies of Brazil, Russia, India, and China made for a compelling story among investors by capturing widespread views over the trajectory of the global economy. BRICs became a household phrase following the onset of financial crises and recessions among advanced economies in 2008. The United States was struggling to escape stagnation, the Eurozone found itself shackled by a common currency, and Japan's decade-long deflationary malady intensified. 

Meanwhile, the BRICs enjoyed near double-digit GDP growth, with no more than a brief interruption in 2009, and a flood of capital from yield-hungry investors looking for an alternative to the low returns on U.S. bonds and equities. Emerging Problems Unfortunately, the BRICs' fortunes have reversed. China's export prowess has faltered and its economy has slowed. 

The "commodities super cycle," which saw Brazil and Russia supply China with the raw inputs it needed to sustain a massive trade surplus, has ground to a halt, contributing to historically low oil prices. Portfolio investment may continue to recede as the United States prepares to raise interest rates, exposing cracks in the BRICs that could be signs of difficult times to come. 

Weaker exports and portfolio investment hamper growth. 

Since the foreign currency used by consumers and investors to purchase exports and portfolio securities eventually winds up with central banks, their access to foreign exchange reserves may come under strain. Dwindling reserves limit central banks' scope to prop up currencies by intervening in foreign exchange markets. This undermines their capacity to guarantee the foreign-denominated debts of their governments and financial systems. 

The fiscal positions of governments reliant on revenue from state-owned oil companies will also deteriorate in the face of low prices. As currencies depreciate, the relative value of revenues denominated in domestic currency and used to service foreign-denominated debts declines, imposing a growing debt burden on borrowers. 

To make matters worse, inflation may take off as the price of imports increases, in effect reducing consumers' real income via higher prices. 

 Misery Loves Company 

 Brazil and Russia share some unhappy similarities. Both economies are reliant on petroleum and commodities exports and are already feeling the pinch from dramatically lower prices. Both have highly indebted corporate sectors, and since much of this debt is denominated in dollars, the weakness in their currencies may yet cause a string of defaults. Where they differ is in their willingness to reform and woo investors. 

Brazil's President, Dilma Rousseff, has taken bold steps to try to improve the country's bloated government finances, though her left-wing congress may still thwart her efforts. 

While Brazil's economy may languish as a result of its leader's inability to reform, Russia's will more than likely continue to suffer, thanks to President Putin's unwillingness to do so. A de-escalation of the war in Ukraine and the lifting of sanctions would help reverse the 50% depreciation in the value of the ruble since August, 2014. Unfortunately, his record of intransigence is less than encouraging. 

It's all downhill from here unless oil makes a comeback, which some industry leaders have suggested. 

 China is beginning to suffer growing pains as it attempts to transition from an export-led economy to a consumer-based one. Rising wages and the appreciation of the renminbi as the government attempts to achieve reserve currency clout have undermined China's export competitiveness. Manufacturers reliant on cheap labor no longer look to China, preferring Vietnam or the Philippines. 

Several trillion dollars of public investment spent trying to counteract the shock of the Great Recession have dried up - much of it was wasted. Consumption and private investment meanwhile haven't grown enough to pick up the slack left by shrinking government expenditures. 

China's opaque and extensive shadow-banking system worries many investors, leaving them to wonder if complex debt liabilities of an unknown scale represent a ticking time bomb. 

 There's a New Sheriff in Town 

India, on the other hand, is a net importer of energy products; falling prices will actually improve its current account. Narendra Modi, India's newly elected Prime Minister, has demonstrated his pragmatism and desire for reform, taking advantage of the fall in energy prices to cut wasteful state fuel subsidies. He now plans to reform complex labor laws and invest in public infrastructure. 

Previous government's failure to do so has prevented India from becoming a manufacturing economy on par with China. India is one of the only countries in the world that requires large industrial employers to get approval from public officials before firing employees. 

Thanks to its import composition and Modi's reputation as the darling of international investors, India looks best positioned to weather the storm of capital flight and falling oil prices. India's currency has outperformed most of its emerging market peers by miles. 

 To be fair, the divergent fundamentals of the BRICs economies have been longstanding. However, unlike the BRICs of the boom years, the BRICs of 2015 are no longer the engines of global growth, but are instead being superseded by advanced economies and their smaller emerging market peers. 

 Ultra-low interest rates in the Eurozone and Japan will hopefully keep yield-hungry investors actively engaged in emerging markets; otherwise, the BRICs can no longer expect to be the joint beneficiaries of easy money. All this calls into question the wisdom of conflating a group of countries with radically divergent profiles. 

 The BRICs are cracking, some more worryingly than others. Their leaders must take bold steps to reinforce the foundations of their economies through structural reforms, lest their houses come crashing down around them.

Saturday, 14 March 2015

A2s: As part of the Globalisation topic can you all...

watch this - the first 30 minutes at least. It is important that you see the globalisation trend as more than a purely economic issue; the rush for growth has many other ramifications and you, as economists, are expected not only to account for human behaviour in your thinking and writing, but to consider the impact on humans of given policies and government actions. This is the video that had over 200m hits in one week, but has now been removed from Chinese websites by the authorities. Think about that as you consider how China is getting where it wants to go, and think about our role in assisting them: