Quote of the day

“I find economics increasingly satisfactory, and I think I am rather good at it.”– John Maynard Keynes
Showing posts with label oil. Show all posts
Showing posts with label oil. Show all posts

Thursday, 25 May 2023

Impact of a windfall tax (as I said all along...)

 

author-image
JULIET SAMUEL

Treasury idiocy is killing North Sea energy

Ministers privately admit that hastily extending the windfall tax was a mistake and its true cost is now becoming clear

The Times
Share
Save

David Duguid well remembers the Burns Night he spent in Baku, Azerbaijan. On the hunt for haggis, he had to criss-cross the city from shop to shop. The marvel, perhaps, is that he was able to find any at all, let alone 13 tins. But, as he says: “You go anywhere in the world in oil and gas and you’ll hear Scottish accents.”

For how much longer will this be true? Duguid is now a Tory MP representing Banff and Buchan, a rural region heavily reliant on North Sea oil and gas. Despite historically high prices, the industry he joined decades ago is under siege and the future of its next generation of workers is in doubt. The downturn is being driven by a rash of taxes and political attacks. Banks have stopped lending. Britain’s oil and gas industry, one of our prime economic assets and an employer of 150,000 people on good salaries, is being systematically strangled.

Climate activists have had the industry in their sights for years and their campaigns have taken a toll. But it is the recent rounds of poorly designed windfall taxes, and warnings by Labour that it will stop all “new investment” in fossil fuels, that have really sent the industry into a tailspin. Nine in ten capital projects in the North Sea are now on hold. The largest of them is the Rosebank field, where work was due to start extracting 300 million barrels of oil. Activity in new fields is at a 40-year low. Investment has cratered to the point where future production will be below even what is required by the Climate Change Committee’s preferred “pathway” to net zero.

• Aberdeen could lose standing in energy sector due to ‘hostile political environment’

The North Sea is critical to British energy security. Oil and gas supply more than two thirds of our overall energy. Wind and solar, despite all the hoo-ha, supply less than 10 per cent and cannot be relied upon in the wrong weather. About half our oil and a third of our gas is produced in the North Sea. So running it down simply means the UK will have to import more, which is both riskier and more carbon-intensive.

Despite this, the industry has been recklessly treated as a cash cow for years. A tipping point has now been reached with the latest so-called windfall tax, introduced last autumn in Jeremy Hunt’s frantic post-Truss fix-it job. The government’s first windfall tax had been set to expire in 2025. But in November, apparently without much thought, the tax was raised and extended to 2028. The new timeline means it will now capture almost every new project due to start in the coming years, even if oil and gas prices fall. It is no longer taxing windfalls, but is imposing a punishingly high cost on doing business.

The impact is striking. The UK’s biggest producer, Harbour Energy, wound up paying an effective tax rate of 100 per cent last year. Without the extra tax, its profits would have risen eight-fold. As it was, during a bumper year for all its rivals outside the UK, it barely broke even. It soon put all its British projects on ice and started talking about job cuts — precisely what campaigners for the tax told us wouldn’t happen.

Even this isn’t enough for them. Labour has vowed to close down “loopholes”, otherwise known as incentives to invest, if it gets into power. This would be the seventh major change to this tax regime in 20 years, in an industry that thinks in decades. Norway, whose successful windfall tax has been cited so often, has changed its regime just once in that time (to make it more generous during Covid). And Oslo suspends the tax when prices fall below a certain level. As a result, Norway has saved Europe from freezing and is finding ever more supplies. The UK, by contrast, has become an investment pariah. One after another, corporate presentations to shareholders are emphasising a shift away from Britain towards other, more stable political environments, like West Africa.

• North Sea Transition Authority gives green light for 20 carbon storage sites in UK waters

All of this at a time when Europe’s energy crisis is still very much unsolved. Prices may have fallen for now and yes, we made it through last winter because the weather was average and Chinese demand was still in lockdown. But what about the coming winter, and the one after that? The plan, insofar as there is one, is to rely on more imports from the United States or Middle East, which means being at the mercy of global gas markets — while Britain wrecks its own production prospects and fails to open more storage capacity so we can stockpile.

Nor will the levies bring in much revenue. Investors fear they’ll wipe ten years off the life of the industry and bring forward decommissioning costs, which the government is obliged to help fund. Overall, this will cost the Treasury money.

If all of this were actually good for the planet, one could perhaps make some argument in its favour. But it is likely to cause a significant rise in global carbon emissions. If UK production falls, Britain will be forced to buy more European gas and Europe will in turn burn more coal and import more carbon-intensive gas by ship. If the North Sea infrastructure is dismantled, a key part of Britain’s net-zero plans will become much harder. Carbon capture, the burial of CO2 emissions, will require the North Sea’s gas chambers, its pipelines, rigs, terminals and workforce. Instead of nurturing this supply chain, the people in it and their specialist skills, the government is presiding over a mass exodus of talent.

Does any of this sound perverse and shocking? Well, it’s no shock to the government. In private, ministers and their advisers readily admit they acted in haste and messed up the whole thing. They know they could alleviate the damage with relative ease, by applying a price floor to the tax and increasing investment allowances.

This wouldn’t eliminate the threat from Labour policy, but it would at least change the status quo and force the opposition to deal seriously with the trade-offs when it gains power. Yet despite quiet reassurances to the industry, March’s budget came and went without news. Ask government insiders why and they squirm. “The politics are difficult,” they whisper. “It doesn’t play well.” In other words, our government is knowingly engaged in an act of economic vandalism purely for the sake of short-term political gain. It is sacrificing both Britain’s energy security and the climate because “standing up to Big Oil” sounds good in focus groups.

A few weeks ago, the country was appalled to learn that Russia had been sending spy vessels around the North Sea in a possible precursor to sabotage. The truth is that Moscow needn’t bother. If the government has its way, North Sea industry will soon be in irreversible decline. Who needs the FSB when you have the Treasury?

Sunday, 6 May 2018

Sunday morning must-read on global outlook

Ambrose Evans Pritchard in the Telegraph gives a quick run through of important data, and the potential risks facing the global economy. Plenty of take-away in here - data, current conditions, forward-looking indicators, comparisons etc.

The whole world is slowing and Europe is just as vulnerable as Britain

World trade contracted in February as China cooled. It may be an early warning sign that monetary tightening by central banks is starting to bite  CREDIT:  AP
This has reduced the growth rate of the eurozone’s broad M3 money supply to 2pc (three-month annualised). It is close to stall speed. Tim Congdon from the Institute of International Monetary Research says Europe faces a “monetary cliff” when QE ends. It risks sliding back into the quagmire of 2011-2014.

A parallel saga is underway in the US where "quantitative tightening" is underway and the Federal Reserve is draining dollar liquidity at an accelerating rate. By the September the Fed will be shrinking its balance sheet by $50bn (£36bn) a month. It is also raising rates at a brisk pace, lifting the worldwide cost of corporate capital.

Three-month Libor – used to price $9 trillion of US and global contracts – has risen by 60 basis points since early February to a nine-year high of 2.36pc. This is causing international tremors. Hong Kong has had to intervene at five times in the exchange markets and is squeezing its leveraged financial system. Local Hibor rates are soaring. This will soon show who has been swimming naked in the frothy waters of the Pacific Rim.
In China, proxy indicators suggest that the true rate of economic growth dropped to 4.5pc at the start of the year as pollution controls combined with the delayed effects of tighter credit. It is why the People’s Bank (PBOC) cut the reserve requirement ratio for lenders by 100 basis points two weeks ago and signaled more to come.

The Dutch CPB index of world trade contracted by 0.4pc in February, the most recent month available. Data on US road freight volume is more recent and it is hardly glorious. The American Trucking Association says its gauge of tonnage fell 0.8pc in February and a further 1.1pc in March.

Contrary to general belief, commodity prices have been falling this year. The broad IHS index of raw materials – including items such as rubber or fibres that are free from the distorting effects of financial speculation – peaked in early January and has been sliding fitfully ever since.

Oil is rising but not because of any acceleration in world demand. Brent crude prices have spiked to a three-year highnear $75 a barrel because production cuts by Opec and Russia have at last cleared the glut. This leaves the global economy more vulnerable to supply shocks, and there are plenty of geostrategic storms coming into view.

The implosion of the Maduro regime in Venezuela is causing a collapse in oil output. If Donald Trump re-imposes sanctions on Iran in May – now highly likely – it might reduce global supply by 700,000 barrels a day within a year.

The effect of rising energy costs on a slowing global economy is toxic. Consumers in the US, Europe, China, and India enjoyed a $1.6 trillion annual windfall when prices slumped in 2015 and 2016. This year they have been hit with an $800bn headwind.

Should we worry about a possible British recession? Yes, we should. The growth rate of real M1 money (three-month) has collapsed. The Bank of England’s Governor, Mark Carney, is right to back away from a rate rise in May.
We do not yet have the full first quarter readings from the eurozone. French GDP growth slid from 0.7pc to 0.3pc. The Bundesbank says only that the German economy has slowed “noticeably”. The Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK) in Düsseldorf says its recession risk indicator has jumped to 32.4pc, higher than in March 2008.

My guess is that Europe will muddle through the next few months in better shape than Britain, winning the immediate beauty contest. Those who want to turn this into a larger indictment of Brexit will have a field day. But note a caveat: the UK is still imposing austerity. Europe is adding fiscal stimulus.

The IMF estimates that Britain is tightening budget policy this year by 0.3pc of GDP, based on the "cyclically adjusted primary balance". The eurozone is loosening by 0.3pc. “It could go some way to explain the UK/euro area growth differences,” said David Owen from Jefferies.

Such subtleties will be lost in the political shouting match over Brexit, just as they were last year when the eurozone’s growth rate was flattered by the closure of its post-depression "output gap". 
This year may be treacherous. “It has been an extremely long cycle and everybody is asking when the next crisis is coming,” said Garth Williams, head of credit conditions for Standard & Poor’s.

“We are at an extremely difficult stage in the transition. Central banks have been absorbing a lot of debt supply and nobody knows what will happen when they are not there anymore,” he said.

Let us hope the first quarter turns out to be an "air pocket", with global growth picking up again over the rest of the year as Donald Trump’s tax cuts feed through into the US economy.

If not, Britain will start to face its Brexit ordeal in earnest. And Europe will start to pay the existential price of its own great failure: neglecting to fortify monetary union with the fiscal machinery needed to survive the next downturn. Pick your drama.

Sunday, 11 January 2015

Short series on oil prices

Useful snapshot of the world of oil prices, with good material for essays. The information comes in a series of short articles, and covers why price is falling, who wins & who loses etc. There may well be other useful links from this author:

http://marketrealist.com/2014/12/drop-in-oil-prices-economic-implications/?utm_source=yahoo&utm_medium=feed&utm_content=toc-1&utm_campaign=how-the-rising-dollar-is-causing-oil-prices-to-fall

When fiscal become supply-side


Sunday Times

Tim Shipman and Danny Fortson Published: 11 January 2015
The oil price collapse has led to a sharp drop in North Sea drilling and a flurry of job and pay cutsThe oil price collapse has led to a sharp drop in North Sea drilling and a flurry of job and pay cuts (Getty)
GEORGE OSBORNE is working on an emergency tax cut to reverse an alarming decline in investment that threatens the future of the North Sea.
The chancellor told The Sunday Times that “more action” was needed to help the industry after the oil price plunged to $49 a barrel — a 57% dive in just six months.
The collapse has led to a sharp drop in North Sea drilling and a flurry of job and pay cuts. The industry employs 375,000 people and is one of the biggest contributors to the exchequer.
Executives want action to prevent a full-blown crisis. The chancellor said he may use the budget in March to unveil a tax bailout.
“In December, I announced some cuts in our oil taxes and set out the plan for the future,” he said. “I don’t want to pre-empt the budget but I can see that may well involve further reducing the burden of tax on investment in the North Sea.”
Production last year averaged just 1.2m barrels a day — a 75% drop from the 1999 high. Companies say one of the biggest challenges is the tax take, which can run to 80% for old fields. The basic levy is 60%.
A supplementary corporation tax charge was introduced in 2002 by Gordon Brown. Osborne lopped 2% from the basic rate in the autumn statement but the industry says this is not enough.
The proposals under discussion include removing the supplementary tax altogether for new developments, and creating a simpler regime to replace the jumble of allowances and tax breaks that govern North Sea work.
The drilling of exploration wells last year fell to levels not seen since the industry was in its infancy. The French giant Total cancelled a project last week. Several comp–anies, including BP and Wood Group, have cut contractors’ pay.
Osborne said: “We have a record amount of investment in the North Sea. A lot of these investments take a long-term view but there’s no doubt the dramatic fall in the oil price has raised questions about future investment in the North Sea.”

Tuesday, 23 December 2014

A little snippet from history


22 December 1973: Opec more than doubles the price of oil

[That Jag in the picture has TWO fuel tanks; I can remember someone with one of these wincing as he filled it up - 6mpg or thereabouts. Way to go carbon footprint!]


Cars queueing at a petrol station, 198=73 opec oil crisis © Getty Images
The price hike hit motorists hard

Opec’s recent decision not cut production sent massive shock waves causing the price of oil to plummet, but on this day in 1973 Opec took, an arguably even more shocking decision.

Overnight, Opec more than doubled the price of oil from $5.12 a barrel to $11.65. The initial price was in fact a hike of its own a few months earlier on a price of $3. The price increase caused the legendary 1973 oil crisis, and was a major shock for the western world economy.
The reason behind the price hike was political. Israel had just won the Yom Kippur war against Egypt and Syria. The two Arab countries launched a surprise attack on Israel during the Jewish Yom Kippur festival. The aim was to reverse the losses of the Six Day War in 1967 and reassert Arab claims over the region.
However, the Opec move was not designed against Israel. It was meant to hurt the United States who had quickly and heavily supplied Israel with military equipment to fight the war, as well as providing political support.
Richard Nixon, the US President at the time, created a new short term Energy Office to deal with the crisis. It implemented price controls which forced ‘old oil’ to stay at a certain price, while newly discovered oil was allowed to be sold at market rates.
It was meant to reduce dependence on Arab oil by opening up new suppliers. However, the result was an artificial shortage in fuel because ‘old oil’ disappeared from the market. To tackle this, the government introduced a rationing programme and even reduced the speed limit to 55mph to cut consumption.
Eventually, the crisis ended through a negotiated settlement between Israel and the Arab countries. Israel came out on top overall but relinquished some of the new land it had taken during the war.
Interestingly, if the increased price of $11.65 in 1973 is adjusted for inflation to 2014 it comes to $63.88. In the last few months the price of crude oil has plummeted from $110 a barrel to around $60.

On a separate but related note, Fathom Consulting was on the radio this morning pointing out that the falling oil price is more likely due to falling demand rather than rising supply (though it is a mix, not either/or). The reasoning given is the slowing growth in China - they put the annual growth rate at 4%, not 7.4%  - and [with all the other posts on China I have given you] you should by now see how all these elements are beginning to fit together. I hesitate to use the term "perfect storm" but a lot of people I know are increasing the cash element of their portfolios (insurance).

Negative interest rates, tax changes and more - A2 material

Swiss take interest rates negative - well, not until 22nd January... what happens on 22nd Jan?

Govt mulling tax cut for oil companies - check out the potential job losses

How the poor end up paying the most tax

David Smith on deflation - good or bad thing?

Short article on falling capital inflows - problem for growth in future?

If the links do not open (because The Times doesn't allow it) post this in the comments section, and I will put the articles up individually. There is plenty more to come, and I expect EVERYONE to make the effort to keep up to date.