Quote of the day

“I find economics increasingly satisfactory, and I think I am rather good at it.”– John Maynard Keynes
Showing posts with label sterling crisis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sterling crisis. Show all posts

Saturday, 15 February 2025

Cheer up time! AEP reckons "things can only get better":

 

Stop moaning – the economy is in better shape than it looks

Labour’s Budget was terrible – but we have more to fear from pathological doom-mongering

Rachel Reeves and Sir Keir Starmer
Britain’s economy is showing green shoots despite Rachel Reeves’s first Budget Credit: Leon Neal/Getty Images Europe

If Britain is hurtling towards a sterling crash, nobody has told the global currency markets.

The pound is today trading at the top of its post-Brexit referendum range against the euro near €1.20. It is massively overvalued against the Japanese yen. The sterling trade-weighted index is near a nine-year peak.

And if this country is insolvent and heading into the arms of the International Monetary Fund – an article of faith on the British political Right – nobody has told the debt markets either.

Credit default swaps (CDS), which measure bankruptcy risk on five-year UK debt, are a well-behaved 23 points, lower than for the US (31), France (35), Canada (40), China (55), Italy (56), Saudi Arabia (62) and Brazil (171).

Few countries are lower. These contracts strip out inflation risk, and therefore offer a quick and dirty insight into residual default risk.

The sophisticated view among hedge funds and global wealth managers is that the British economy is gradually recovering from a string of shocks – Covid, Putin’s gas squeeze, disentangling itself from the barbed wire of Brussels – and may prove to be an outperformer in the late 2020s.

The UK is more open than Europe to disruptive tech and artificial intelligence, despite much exhilarating talk from Emmanuel Macron in Paris this week. The UK is less prone to erecting regulatory and trade barriers at the slightest excuse, and is therefore likely to see a faster spurt of catch-up productivity growth.

The notion that Britain may soon need an IMF bailout akin to the sterling crisis in 1976 plays fast and loose with historical context. “It is nonsense,” said Dario Perkins, global strategist at TS Lombard.

Denis Healey was borrowing in dollars, which the Bank of England cannot print, in order to defend an indefensible exchange rate. The post-war model was disintegrating. Class war had reached fever pitch. The fiscal deficit was 10pc of GDP and inflation had just peaked at 27pc. Opec petrostates were pulling their money out of London.

“In 1976 we hit a complete crisis point. The politics were broken, the economy was broken, the UK was still hanging on to being a reserve currency,” Perkins said.

“None of that is happening today. We have a flexible exchange rate. We’re not going to have a sudden tipping point and a balance of payments crisis: we’re in a totally different world.”

Nor is this anything like the ERM crisis in 1992, when the Bank of England had to raise rates to 15pc during a deepening recession and a property crash, in order to defend sterling against the D-Mark just as the Bundesbank was on the war path over Germany’s reunification boom. Cardinal lesson: never subcontract your monetary policy to another country by pegging your currency.

This is not to forgive Labour for its awful first Budget. Slumpflation fears set off genuinely alarming moves on the markets a few weeks ago, chiefly because global investors felt duped. Strenuous efforts to soothe them ever since – and a recognition that global capital stays only where it is loved – have mended the rift.

Yields on 10-year UK bonds have dropped half a percentage point from their peak and are no longer trading at a penalty over US treasuries. Nor are they now out of alignment with the eurozone core, which “enjoys” lower structural yields only because it is a dead zone in the grip of Japanification.

The latest data on foreign direct investment from UN Trade and Development (Unctad) show that the UK was a star performer last year, capturing a 32pc rise in greenfield projects to $85bn (£69bn). Europe saw a 45pc drop in total FDI, with falls of 60pc in Germany and Poland.

The UK’s top project was Blackstone’s £10bn plan to build Europe’s biggest hyperscaler at Blyth, on the Northumberland coast. Data centres are now deemed “critical national infrastructure”, making it easier to bulldoze through planning obstructionism. The campus – Project Wind – will be powered mostly by North Sea wind turbines.

Blackstone is a hard-nosed $1.1 trillion US asset manager. It would not spend £10bn on an electricity-devouring data centre if it believed scare stories about a coming British power crisis. It is betting on the opposite outcome.

As a Conservative, my advice to the Tories is to stop wasting political capital railing against clean tech because a) it makes you look economically primitive, and b) it will come back to bite you in four years. There are genuine reasons to attack Labour, not least its levelling-down assault on British schools.

From my angle covering the world economy, the UK looks better than it does when seen from the inside. Most of the globe is in some sort of trouble. Bond and currency markets are ultimately a contest of the least ugly.

Lord Agnew, a Tory ex-Treasury minister, portrays Britain as a particular basket case, on “suicide watch”, borrowing and squandering as if there were no tomorrow.

I agree that the UK has long been living beyond its means, relying on foreign capital to cover trade and fiscal twin deficits. It has racked up a net international investment position of minus £837bn – though the US worries me more, at minus $23.6 trillion.

Nevertheless, I think our bad predicament is getting better rather than worse.

The UK’s current account deficit was 6.2pc of GDP in early 2016, evidence of insidious macroeconomic imbalances under EU membership, but also of depleting North Sea oil and gas reserves.

The structural deficit has since closed to 2.8pc. The big beast in the remaining gap is energy, biting again this week as gas prices spike to a two-year high.

But energy imports are on a descending path as electric cars and hybrids displace petrol vehicles, renewables displace gas in power plants, and heat pumps displace gas boilers in homes. The UK will eventually become a large exporter of offshore wind to Europe, regaining the position it once had as a regional energy powerhouse.

The National Institute of Economic and Social Research says the UK needs sustained public investment of 4-5pc of GDP per year to escape decline and catalyse a hi-tech economy.

Labour talked big before the election but then spent most of its £142bn in extra borrowing this parliament on pay deals for its friends. Net public investment will be just 2.4pc of GDP by 2029, better than recent history, but still below the G7 average.

It is hard to be giddy with enthusiasm but the UK has other strengths, thankfully, and the curse of paralysing Nimbyism has been lifted. The Bank of England is cutting rates. Less fiscal drag is coming from austerity.

This year may not be as bad as many fear.

If there is a major threat to the UK’s long-term prospects it comes chiefly from the un-British and feral character of our current political discourse.

We gracelessly hounded Rishi Sunak from office for sins that most cannot remember, and there seems to be a pathological urge to do much the same to Sir Keir Starmer.

We all need to lay off social media for Lent and calm down.

Friday, 10 January 2025

This explains what I have been talking about very clearly:

 

Labour Britain is the new ‘PIGS’ of the global markets

The UK has carelessly exposed itself as the weakest link in the G7 at a perilous moment

It is a near certain bet that Sir Keir Starmer will try to defy the bond vigilantes, hoping that global wealth funds will spot a bargain and start scooping up gilts at distressed prices without any need for Labour to change its current destructive course.

He may be lucky, but the international credibility of this Government is already holed below the waterline. A few more days like this week’s rolling debacle will force his hand.

“Financial players think they were taken for a ride by Rachel Reeves in her pre-election charm offensives, and they don’t like it,” said Bernard Connolly, a veteran adviser to hedge funds and central banks, through multiple debt crises.

“Treasury reassurances will not help. The real fear in markets is that there is a vicious circle in which low growth worsens debt problems. They increasingly fear that the Government can’t get a grip. Something needs to happen to change the narrative,” he said.

Feeding Rachel Reeves to the sharks might placate some, but it “might also make them smell blood in the water”, he said. The larger fundamental problem remains.

“This Government seems hell-bent on snatching defeat from every opportunity,” said Marc Ostwald, a bond specialist at ADM. “We were all hoping for stability after the incessant turmoil of the Tories, but it is now clear to markets that Labour don’t know what they are doing.”

The yield on 10-year gilts briefly touched 4.98pc on Thursday, nearing levels last seen in the late 1990s. “Once it slices through the psychological line of 5pc in a situation like this, the next stop can easily be 6pc. We’re not far away from the point when the Bank of England or the Treasury will have to come up with a circuit-breaker,” said Mr Ostwald.

It is no longer credible to argue that the UK is an innocent collateral casualty of the Trump effect and surging US Treasury yields. This country has carelessly exposed itself as the weakest link in the G7 at a perilous moment, just as international capital markets start to choke on the volumes of debt issuance across the world.

The UK has managed to make an even bigger mess of its fiscal reputation even than Emmanuel Macron’s France, which has no real government, no budget, worse debts and runaway fiscal deficits of 6pc of GDP. This is quite a feat.

The former “PIGS” of the eurozone debt crisis – Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain – have all done better. Italy’s 10-year bond yields are today slightly lower than they were a year ago. They were then trading at the same level as equivalent gilts. As I write, Reeves must pay 130 basis points more than her Italian counterpart to borrow for 10 years.

“That tells you more than anything else what an absolute mess we have got ourselves into, and I don’t see how Labour can easily turn this around,” said Albert Edwards, global strategist for Société Générale.

We cannot keep fooling ourselves that higher borrowing costs chiefly reflect a perkier economy, with less risk of recessionary deflation than the becalmed eurozone. That comforting illusion died when Reeves talked the economy into zero growth with her mischievous black hole.

She kicked business in the teeth and concocted a Budget plan that borrows an extra £142bn over this parliament – and still ends up with a smaller economy and lower real living standards than would have been the case under Rishi Sunak.

It has taken just three months for the Chancellor to lift the toxic “term premium” on British bonds to levels that endanger this country’s long-term debt dynamics.

The widening gilt spread over Italian, French or Spanish bonds is doubly remarkable because the UK has what ought to be an advantage. The Bank of England can intervene at any moment to buy debt and burn speculators.

The European Central Bank is more constrained by the “no bailout” clause of the Maastricht Treaty. It can no longer get away with monetising the debts of southern Europe under the guise of quantitative easing, and it does not have the legal or political power to do so with its new anti-spread tool (TPI) except in extremis.

Yet traders are still betting more heavily against Reeves regardless.

Krishna Guha and Marco Casiraghi, from Evercore ISI, said the gilts sell-off has not yet reached “Liz Truss standards of crazy” but it is becoming serious enough to require an emergency response.

“We think the Bank of England should consider suspending quantitative tightening (reverse QE) if market pressures continue to build over the next few days, with more radical steps to buy gilts outright,” they said.

They warned that it is a dangerous time for sovereign borrowers to court fate because bond dealers everywhere are holding lower inventories than they used to, starving the market of liquidity and inviting spasms of debt stress.

Whether or not the Chancellor meets her fiscal rule is an entirely trivial question.

Global funds could not care less about this arcane British obsession. They care only whether they are being sufficiently rewarded to accept the credit risk of a country issuing £297bn of Treasury debt this fiscal year, and eye-watering sums thereafter, mostly for purposes that do not raise productivity or the UK’s economic speed limit.

Two thirds of extra borrowing is going on fatter pay for Labour’s friends – only a third is going on public investment, the turbo-charged part with a growth multiplier that pays for itself.

Is the yield high enough for a Japanese, Canadian or Saudi investor to justify the inflation risk, currency risk, and economic risk of funding a nation living beyond its means, with a chronic balance of payments deficit near 4pc of GDP, and a net international investment position of minus £1.05 trillion that is run by a political party with no collective experience of the real economic world?

Mr Connolly has a few words of advice from the world of global Big Money: cut corporation tax and freeze both public sector pay and recruitment. Not that he is expecting any such action. “The underlying situation – public finance, current account, productivity, investment, health service – is dreadful. It’s not Argentina territory but a chainsaw would be useful,” he said.

Labour is now hostage to world forces. Donald Trump and Elon Musk may relieve the pressure by slashing spending and tightening US fiscal policy more than markets expect. The Chinese “carry trade” may keep growing, funnelling more of the world’s trapped savings into global credit. Both effects would bring down bond yields for the rest of us.

But Labour has learnt that the Hobbesian hard-knuckled world of 2025 will not extend an unlimited credit line to a self-indulgent class-warfare party that borrows promiscuously to fund consumption, and does profoundly stupid things such as taxing child education and raising the marginal tax rate on small firms to exorbitant levels.

The sooner that Labour recognises the scale of its misjudgements, the more likely it is to earn a second chance.