Quote of the day

“I find economics increasingly satisfactory, and I think I am rather good at it.”– John Maynard Keynes
Showing posts with label FDI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FDI. Show all posts

Saturday, 15 February 2025

Cheer up time! AEP reckons "things can only get better":

 

Stop moaning – the economy is in better shape than it looks

Labour’s Budget was terrible – but we have more to fear from pathological doom-mongering

Rachel Reeves and Sir Keir Starmer
Britain’s economy is showing green shoots despite Rachel Reeves’s first Budget Credit: Leon Neal/Getty Images Europe

If Britain is hurtling towards a sterling crash, nobody has told the global currency markets.

The pound is today trading at the top of its post-Brexit referendum range against the euro near €1.20. It is massively overvalued against the Japanese yen. The sterling trade-weighted index is near a nine-year peak.

And if this country is insolvent and heading into the arms of the International Monetary Fund – an article of faith on the British political Right – nobody has told the debt markets either.

Credit default swaps (CDS), which measure bankruptcy risk on five-year UK debt, are a well-behaved 23 points, lower than for the US (31), France (35), Canada (40), China (55), Italy (56), Saudi Arabia (62) and Brazil (171).

Few countries are lower. These contracts strip out inflation risk, and therefore offer a quick and dirty insight into residual default risk.

The sophisticated view among hedge funds and global wealth managers is that the British economy is gradually recovering from a string of shocks – Covid, Putin’s gas squeeze, disentangling itself from the barbed wire of Brussels – and may prove to be an outperformer in the late 2020s.

The UK is more open than Europe to disruptive tech and artificial intelligence, despite much exhilarating talk from Emmanuel Macron in Paris this week. The UK is less prone to erecting regulatory and trade barriers at the slightest excuse, and is therefore likely to see a faster spurt of catch-up productivity growth.

The notion that Britain may soon need an IMF bailout akin to the sterling crisis in 1976 plays fast and loose with historical context. “It is nonsense,” said Dario Perkins, global strategist at TS Lombard.

Denis Healey was borrowing in dollars, which the Bank of England cannot print, in order to defend an indefensible exchange rate. The post-war model was disintegrating. Class war had reached fever pitch. The fiscal deficit was 10pc of GDP and inflation had just peaked at 27pc. Opec petrostates were pulling their money out of London.

“In 1976 we hit a complete crisis point. The politics were broken, the economy was broken, the UK was still hanging on to being a reserve currency,” Perkins said.

“None of that is happening today. We have a flexible exchange rate. We’re not going to have a sudden tipping point and a balance of payments crisis: we’re in a totally different world.”

Nor is this anything like the ERM crisis in 1992, when the Bank of England had to raise rates to 15pc during a deepening recession and a property crash, in order to defend sterling against the D-Mark just as the Bundesbank was on the war path over Germany’s reunification boom. Cardinal lesson: never subcontract your monetary policy to another country by pegging your currency.

This is not to forgive Labour for its awful first Budget. Slumpflation fears set off genuinely alarming moves on the markets a few weeks ago, chiefly because global investors felt duped. Strenuous efforts to soothe them ever since – and a recognition that global capital stays only where it is loved – have mended the rift.

Yields on 10-year UK bonds have dropped half a percentage point from their peak and are no longer trading at a penalty over US treasuries. Nor are they now out of alignment with the eurozone core, which “enjoys” lower structural yields only because it is a dead zone in the grip of Japanification.

The latest data on foreign direct investment from UN Trade and Development (Unctad) show that the UK was a star performer last year, capturing a 32pc rise in greenfield projects to $85bn (£69bn). Europe saw a 45pc drop in total FDI, with falls of 60pc in Germany and Poland.

The UK’s top project was Blackstone’s £10bn plan to build Europe’s biggest hyperscaler at Blyth, on the Northumberland coast. Data centres are now deemed “critical national infrastructure”, making it easier to bulldoze through planning obstructionism. The campus – Project Wind – will be powered mostly by North Sea wind turbines.

Blackstone is a hard-nosed $1.1 trillion US asset manager. It would not spend £10bn on an electricity-devouring data centre if it believed scare stories about a coming British power crisis. It is betting on the opposite outcome.

As a Conservative, my advice to the Tories is to stop wasting political capital railing against clean tech because a) it makes you look economically primitive, and b) it will come back to bite you in four years. There are genuine reasons to attack Labour, not least its levelling-down assault on British schools.

From my angle covering the world economy, the UK looks better than it does when seen from the inside. Most of the globe is in some sort of trouble. Bond and currency markets are ultimately a contest of the least ugly.

Lord Agnew, a Tory ex-Treasury minister, portrays Britain as a particular basket case, on “suicide watch”, borrowing and squandering as if there were no tomorrow.

I agree that the UK has long been living beyond its means, relying on foreign capital to cover trade and fiscal twin deficits. It has racked up a net international investment position of minus £837bn – though the US worries me more, at minus $23.6 trillion.

Nevertheless, I think our bad predicament is getting better rather than worse.

The UK’s current account deficit was 6.2pc of GDP in early 2016, evidence of insidious macroeconomic imbalances under EU membership, but also of depleting North Sea oil and gas reserves.

The structural deficit has since closed to 2.8pc. The big beast in the remaining gap is energy, biting again this week as gas prices spike to a two-year high.

But energy imports are on a descending path as electric cars and hybrids displace petrol vehicles, renewables displace gas in power plants, and heat pumps displace gas boilers in homes. The UK will eventually become a large exporter of offshore wind to Europe, regaining the position it once had as a regional energy powerhouse.

The National Institute of Economic and Social Research says the UK needs sustained public investment of 4-5pc of GDP per year to escape decline and catalyse a hi-tech economy.

Labour talked big before the election but then spent most of its £142bn in extra borrowing this parliament on pay deals for its friends. Net public investment will be just 2.4pc of GDP by 2029, better than recent history, but still below the G7 average.

It is hard to be giddy with enthusiasm but the UK has other strengths, thankfully, and the curse of paralysing Nimbyism has been lifted. The Bank of England is cutting rates. Less fiscal drag is coming from austerity.

This year may not be as bad as many fear.

If there is a major threat to the UK’s long-term prospects it comes chiefly from the un-British and feral character of our current political discourse.

We gracelessly hounded Rishi Sunak from office for sins that most cannot remember, and there seems to be a pathological urge to do much the same to Sir Keir Starmer.

We all need to lay off social media for Lent and calm down.

Thursday, 9 January 2025

Innovation, red tape, investment - all in here

 

Is Ed Miliband going to throw away our brilliant fusion industry?

The Energy Secretary risks squandering the exponential take-off of a great British advantage

Inside the ST40 spherical tokamak
Oxfordshire-based Tokamak Energy is a world leader in fusion yet the technology is being overlooked by ministers Credit: Geoff Pugh for the Telegraph

The UK hosts the greatest concentration of skills in nuclear fusion anywhere on the planet. At least, that is the view of the world’s Fusion Industry Association in Washington.

This highly esteemed ecosystem is the legacy of decades of work on magnetic tokamak reactors at the international JET project near Oxford. The UK is also in the top league in the parallel technology of inertial fusion using lasers, led by the plasma physics team at Imperial College London.

The three commercial fusion start-ups on UK soil – Tokamak Energy, First Light Fusion and Canada’s General Fusion – have together raised more money for development than private fusion in the rest of Europe.

Yet Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, scarcely mentioned fusion in his speech last month to the nuclear industry.

He gushed about the “massive industrial opportunity” for Britain from Great British Nuclear and small modular reactors. He spoke in glowing terms about Hinkley Point and Sizewell C, praising big fission as “an economic engine” for the country.

“My message is clear: if you want to build a nuclear project in Britain, my door is open. I think this is a brilliant industry,” he said.

No doubt he means it. Mr Miliband pushed for the biggest expansion of nuclear power in Europe when he last held the job in 2009, against a green Left that was then still viscerally anti-nuclear.

But all he had to say about fusion was a dry, loveless, box-ticking put-down that “significant support” for research had been announced in the Budget, leaving the fusion industry wondering what will survive of its promising cluster after the Government’s spending review this spring.

One has to ask whether Mr Miliband fully understands that fusion is at the point of exponential take-off right now, not far off in the blue yonder, and that the US, China, and Japan are in a technology race to win this incalculable economic and diplomatic prize.

My impression is that even energy experts still tend to assume, from habit, that replicating the power of the sun by fusing hydrogen isotopes remains an exotic experiment in theoretical physics, unlikely to produce anything usable until the late 21st century.

But the confluence of high-temperature superconductors, supercomputers and new laser technology have changed the economics of fusion power almost overnight.

Bob Mumgaard, founder of Commonwealth Fusion in the US, told me that better superconductors had suddenly and vastly increased the power of magnets, used to squeeze plasma to temperatures 10 times hotter than the surface of the sun.

“We can build a plant that is 40 times smaller,” he said. Bingo.

Tokamak Energy, near Oxford, is a world leader in producing these super-conducting magnets, a spin-off from fusion work that is already creating a wonderful side-business. These tapes of rare-earth barium copper oxide (Rebco) can slash energy use for all kinds of things, since they transmit electricity without resistance.

“You can use them in data centres. You just plug into a socket in the wall, and you cool to 20 kelvin (minus 253 degrees),” said Warrick Matthews, the chief executive. “We’re already exploring several hundred contracts for magnets.”

Tokamak Energy is aiming for fusion power at $70 (£56) per megawatt hour (MWh) for its first fleet, and closer to $50 thereafter. “That stacks up against anything. The capital markets are going to wake up and realise that the prize is absolutely immense,” he said.

A recent poll of industry specialists found that 65pc think fusion will generate electricity at viable cost in the early 2030s. Exuberant optimism perhaps – there is a large and glorious list of headaches, from rogue neutrons to unstable plasma that can destroy everything. But if they are anywhere close to being right, it would be criminal negligence for Labour to let this country’s early advantage slip away.

Yet that is what the Fusion Industry Association (FIA) warned in a review before Christmas, as first reported by my colleague James Titcomb. It said the UK had a “time-sensitive and significant opportunity” to capture a chunk of the multi trillion-pound global market. “Failure to seize the moment … risks ceding dominance in one of the most important industries of this century.”

The FIA said 90pc of its members would like to set up shop in the UK, but only a fifth are convinced that the country will do what it takes to become a “strategically significant” supply chain hub. It cited slow bureaucracy and procurement rules that are a turn-off for fast-moving entrepreneurs.

“We’re beginning to wonder if it will even happen,” said one. Another asked whether “the Government wants to see [start-ups] grow here”. Another episode of the perennial British disease?

“The UK has fallen behind massively. It is a big missed opportunity to really lead the world,” said Nick Hawker, head of First Light Fusion, also based outside Oxford. “It is not too late, fusion is a long play; but we need a real national strategy with a diversity of actors and approaches.

“What’s the point of Brexit if it wasn’t to get this stuff done?”

The UK Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) has been heroically proactive. It has stolen a march by pioneering the most business-friendly regime for fusion plants in the West, since followed in spirit by the US.

It will regulate them much like hospitals, making it much quicker to roll out plants. Fusion releases almost no long-term radioactive waste. It cannot lead to a Chernobyl chain reaction. It uses mere grams of deuterium-tritium in the chamber, compared to 200 tonnes of uranium in a fission reactor.

The EU is driving away its fusion start-ups because it has yet to come up with a risk-based regulation, and by default it therefore still treats the industry as if it were fission, making it uninsurable.

This Brussels effect – precautionary inertia – is not going to last. Friedrich Merz, Germany’s chancellor-in-waiting, is a fusion enthusiast and will read the riot act, with allies in France.

The UK Atomic Energy Authority is leading Britain’s £650m Fusion Futures Programme with its state-led spherical tokamak aiming to produce commercial power by 2040, as well as a tritium breeding facility, a laser facility, a robotics centre, and so forth. It is a superb piece of industrial strategy.

Tokamak energy reactors
The UKAEA aims to build on the success of commercial operators and have a commercially viable tokamak by 2040 Credit: Tokamak Energy

But it is only one pillar. The FIA says money and focus have been heavily geared to the UK’s speciality in magnetic tokamaks, although these account for just six of the 45 fusion companies worldwide.

Seven are pursuing laser-driven inertial fusion, which has the record energy “gain” rate of over 2.0 at America’s Lawrence Livermore lab. Nine are going for stellarators, a German engineering favourite that may prove more stable. These rival technologies feel badly neglected.

At least 12 fusion start-ups aim to launch prototype plants within this parliament. The UK could snag several of them if it rolls out the red carpet, turning Oxford into the go-to site for all-comers. The FIA has a menu of demands, including an urgent task force, and the same contracts for difference available to fission, wind, or solar companies.

Building this second pillar would not cost much – far less than the £2.7bn committed to Sizewell C, which will not go live much before 2040, and may cost $120 MWh in today’s money when it does – but it does require more than a perfunctory one-liner from the Energy Secretary.

If the Government believes its own rhetoric on industrial policy, it should copy the best of the US Inflation Reduction Act and offer tax credits to any fusion company that comes to the UK. Seed money from Washington has pulled in private funds for US fusion start-ups at a ratio of 6:1. That is a multiplier worth having.

Fusion ought to tick every box for Labour. It is clean – its main by-product is inert helium. The fuel is effectively limitless and does not come from Russia. It uses almost no land, and little water, and can be made unobtrusive. Unlike today’s big fission, it can dial up and down, and it produces industrial high-grade heat to help decarbonise industry.

It would be a crying shame, Mr Miliband, if we blew such a marvellous chance.

Thursday, 23 May 2024

Thinking about the work we did on innovation...

 

MAY 23RD 2024