Quote of the day

“I find economics increasingly satisfactory, and I think I am rather good at it.”– John Maynard Keynes

Thursday, 27 February 2025

Nice example of the Laffer Curve:

 

Reeves’s tax raid is firing up Britain’s hidden economy

Cash economy may be on rise as self-employed seek to dodge Chancellor’s higher taxes

Rachel Reeves's tax demands may have inadvertently boosted the cash economy
Rachel Reeves’s tax demands may have inadvertently boosted the cash economy Credit: Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street

Rachel Reeves should beware: the black, or hidden, economy is once more on the rise, and it may have something to do with the Chancellor’s own tax demands.

There’s a Thai restaurant near where I live where a sign prominently displayed in the window reads “Cash only, no credit or debit cards”.

At first blush, this would seem curiously counter to the wider trend of restaurants and cafes refusing to accept cash. Notes and coins are expensive to process relative to digital payments, and are also acutely vulnerable to the plague of petty crime.

Dig a little deeper, however, and you find that the cash economy may once more be strongly on the rise.

Hard evidence for this contention is admittedly mixed, even if anecdotally it might seem strong. Fewer people carry cash – but especially for casual work, many more are demanding it.

The Bank of England insists that the amount of physical cash issued follows no particular formula, but in any one year is only an estimate of likely demand.

This might suggest little or no increase in the size of the cash economy. None the less, both the number and value of bank notes in circulation have risen considerably over time despite the explosive growth in digital payments for day-to-day purchases.

Between 2005 and 2017, the value of banknotes in circulation doubled, outstripping the growth in the economy by some margin. Even adjusting for rising economic activity and price levels, notes in circulation have been trending upwards ever since the early 1990s.

The big jump, however, was during the pandemic, when demand for physical cash rose strongly even as economic activity collapsed and scare stories proliferated that the use of bank notes was a key cause of viral infection.

The Bank of England has explained this apparent paradox by pointing to the growing attractions of cash as a store of value at a time of low inflation and rock-bottom interest rates.

But my guess is that there is more to it than that.

Relatively recent survey evidence by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) suggested that 8.8pc of UK adults participated in the “hidden” economy, in 2022, well up on the 4.9pc of the previous estimate in 2015 to 2016.

A further 4.8pc of the population were identified as being “possibly involved” in the hidden economy, up from 0.6pc in 2015 to 2016.

Off-the-books use of cash as a means of payment is not solely determined by the amount of cash in circulation either. It’s the velocity of money, rather than its quantity, which determines its economic value. A single £10 note might, for instance, be exchanged multiple times in a day.

More or less everyone will have had some experience of the black economy even if they haven’t themselves participated in it.

Cash is king, many tradesmen will say given the choice between cash and a bank transfer or credit card payment. Generally, the price is lower for cash.

Many of these payments will not be wholly declared for tax purposes. It’s only on very large transactions that cash tends to become impractical and/or hard to hide from the taxman.

Two points are worth making here. One is that if the hidden economy is indeed breaking new ground, it means that the economy as a whole is stronger than the official data suggests.

Rather more worrying for the Government, it also means that a growing proportion of economic activity is escaping the tax net. We may already be seeing this played out in real time as a result of measures in Reeves’s Budget to significantly raise the tax burden.

Tax revenues in January, traditionally a buoyant month because of the deadline for self-assessment, fell significantly short of Office for Budget Responsibility expectations.

Reeves may already be hitting the “Laffer curve” of diminishing returns, particularly among smaller enterprises and the self-employed, whereby higher taxes lead to growing avoidance and evasion.

With personal tax thresholds now frozen until 2027 to 2028, the trend is likely only to get worse.

Self-employed and part-time workers may be choosing to take a greater proportion of what they earn in the form of under-the-counter cash payments. With rising taxes, small and occasional cash earnings are particularly vulnerable to non disclosure.

Nor is it just higher taxes pushing people into the hidden economy. Pressure on disposable incomes from the cost of living crisis further increases the incentives to demand tax-free cash payment for goods and services.

A House of Commons public accounts committee report back in 2020 found that the Bank of England did not “appear to have a convincing reason for why the demand for notes keeps increasing” or any real understanding of where approximately £50bn of issued sterling notes are, or what they are being used for.

Worry not, says HMRC. The so-called “tax gap” – the difference between what HMRC thinks should be paid in tax and what is actually being paid – has been in steady decline for years. At the last estimate, it stood at 4.8pc, or £39.8bn, of what should have been collected.

This would not suggest a growing black economy. Maybe, but given what I see happening all around me, and the manifestly growing incentives for tax-dodging, I remain to be convinced.

As on so much else, we’re plunging back to the “fallen off the back of a lorry” economy of the 1970s and the early 1980s, where tax avoidance and evasion was the name of the game.

This was the unofficial economy of Arthur Daley and Only Fools and Horses. If you tax too much, don’t be surprised when you hit a brick wall of refusal to pay.

Wednesday, 19 February 2025

Part 2 - synthetic fuels (can you detect a note of optimism?):

 

Casey Handmer says solar power is changing the economics of energy

Large-scale production of synthetic fuel is now feasible, argues the founder of Terraform Industries

Portrait of Casey Handmer
Illustration: Diego Mallo
Listen to this story.

By Casey Handmer, founder of Terraform Industries

What if we could make cheap fuel out of thin air? For more than a century, a bewildering variety of methods has been attempted to make drop-in replacements for fossil fuels. Such synthetic fuels could be used with existing energy, transport and industrial infrastructure, collectively worth over $100trn.

Petrol, diesel, kerosene, propane, oil, natural gas and rocket fuel are all hydrocarbons. Synthetic fuel therefore needs sources of hydrogen (from water) and carbon (from atmospheric carbon dioxide). Nature has used this recipe to make living things, including humans, for billions of years. Before the Industrial Revolution, plants were our primary source of fuel. But plants do not use solar energy efficiently enough to make replacements for fossil fuels. Is there another way to use water and air to make huge amounts of cheap fuel?

Whatever process we use will require vast quantities of energy. Synthetic fuel is made by converting electrical energy into chemical energy. But ripping water and carbon-dioxide molecules apart to make fuel requires as much energy as is subsequently released via combustion, and more besides. If done using electricity obtained from the grid, powered by combustion of coal or natural gas, fuel synthesis cannot be cost-competitive with fuel-mining. We need new energy sources that are abundant, cheap and less environmentally harmful than fossil fuels.

And what is the cheapest, most scalable source of energy humanity has ever known? Solar photovoltaics. Carbon-free, zero moving parts, no uranium enrichment, and no specialised labour required. Solar cells are panes of glass that print wealth. We should deploy them accordingly.

It turns out that converting between chemical and electrical energy is about 35% efficient in either direction. Conventionally, burning fuel to make electricity has been the natural economic flow. But once solar energy costs less than 10% of the price of grid power, the economics favour the conversion of electricity into carbon-neutral chemical fuel. This is just a few years away. Solar is getting 15-20% cheaper every year as manufacturing becomes more efficient. Solar synthetic fuel will soon be cheaper than conventional fuel in some markets, and by about 2040 it will be cheaper everywhere.

I noticed this trend four years ago, and resolved to make this vision—of unconditional energy abundance—a reality. I quit my job writing software at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory and founded Terraform Industries. I raised seed funding from investors who shared my forward-looking optimism, hired the smartest engineers I knew, and got to work. At Terraform, we’re now making cheap, synthetic natural gas from sunlight, water and air.

Our “Terraformer” system is a compact chemical plant designed to integrate directly with a one-megawatt solar array in the field—so there are no electricity-transmission costs. It contains an electrolyser (to make hydrogen from water), a carbon-capture system (to extract carbon dioxide from air) and a Sabatier reactor that combines the two to make synthetic natural gas (methane). The whole thing is powered by solar energy.

So far we’ve shown that we can produce hydrogen for less than $2.50 per kg, carbon dioxide for less than $250 per tonne, and pipeline-grade synthetic natural gas for $35 per thousand cubic feet (MCF). This puts us in economic contention in many markets that rely on imported fuel.

We won’t rest until we’ve saturated the global market for any hydrocarbon at a price cheaper than fracking. We have significant further cost reductions on the way, and a pathway for developing liquid fuels from methanol. In 2025 we expect to be able to produce hydrogen for well below $2/kg. Our full-scale Terraformer, which we will demonstrate in the next few months, will produce 2,300 MCF of natural gas per year. (A typical home uses about 70 MCF a year for heating and cooking.) We need to deploy millions of these over the next couple of decades to meet global demand.

Cheap and abundant solar power, directly from the array, will transform dozens of industries beyond fuel production. It can be used for desalination, cement production, to provide industrial heat and to make fertiliser. Solar power unlocks incredible material wealth for all of humanity with a mere fraction of Earth’s land area under panels. And, of course, moving beyond finite fossil fuels to abundant solar energy solves the carbon-emissions problem—in addition to supercharging global economic growth. 

Two posts on the energy future - your future. Part 1 - fusion:

Fusion power is getting closer—no, really

The action is shifting from the public to the private sector

Artists concept view of the interior of the ITER reaction vessel.
Illustration: Science Photo Library
Listen to this story.

By Geoffrey Carr, Senior editor, Science & technology, The Economist

Two developments in the coming year will mark a decisive shift from the public to the private sector in the decades-old quest to generate cheap and abundant power from nuclear fusion. The first will be the opening towards the end of 2025, by a private firm, of a machine called SPARC. This will be the first fusion reactor, public or private, designed to operate at near-commercial scale, with an eventual output of about 140 megawatts (MW). The second will be the non-opening of ITER, the flagship of intergovernmental fusion collaboration, which was scheduled to be ready in 2025. In a hurried announcement in July, that date was postponed.

SPARC is being built by Commonwealth Fusion, a spin-out from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Design-wise, it is a tokamak. This is a machine with a toroidal (ie, doughnut-shaped) reaction vessel surrounded by powerful electromagnets which confine and heat the fuel. That fuel is a plasma of two exotic isotopes of hydrogen: deuterium and tritium. These, when suitably heated and confined, undergo a fusion reaction that liberates helium, neutrons—and a lot of energy.

ITER is a tokamak, too, with an intended power output of 500MW. Unfortunately for the 35-country collaboration building it in France, it won’t be ready in 2025. In fact, it is nine years behind schedule, and will not be switched on until 2034. Commonwealth Fusion hopes to reach “q>1”, the point where a reactor releases more energy than is put into it, in early 2026. ITER will not, on its new schedule, reach this point until 2039.

If SPARC works and provides the data that Commonwealth needs to build a full-scale power plant (scheduled for the early 2030s), that will probably be the end of ITER. And even if things do not go to plan for Commonwealth, it is not alone in trying for fusion with private money.

The latest estimate from the Fusion Industry Association, a trade body, suggests that $7.1bn has been raised by more than 40 firms with fusion in their sights. Many are still tiny startups, but several have more than $200m in funding.

Some of these firms are pursuing more exotic approaches than tokamaks, which have, until now, been the tried-and-trusted design for fusion research. General Fusion, a Canadian firm, plans to compress and heat a deuterium-tritium plasma in liquid-metal cavities. A test reactor, in which the compressing metal remains solid, should switch on in 2025.

Helion, in Washington state, proposes a different fuel: a mixture of deuterium and an unusual isotope of helium. Its latest test-bed, Polaris, should also be up and running in 2025. Zap Energy, also based in Washington state, is reviving a once-obsolete approach called z-pinch. ENN, of Hebei province in China, plans to fuse hydrogen and boron. In short, if Commonwealth Fusion fails to deliver, many other startups are lining up right behind it.