Quote of the day

“I find economics increasingly satisfactory, and I think I am rather good at it.”– John Maynard Keynes

Monday 30 November 2020

Y13 must-read on why Germany has good prospects

 This is full of the sort of thing that you can use to add colour, evaluate, or just lament about the UK:


INVESTMENT FOCUS

The continent’s economic engine is ready to accelerate

THE MITTELSTAND REMAINS COMPETITIVE WITH GLOBAL RIVALS

Germany is the most resilient and dynamic economy in a struggling region. Matthew Partridge reviews its strengths, explains how it is rectifying its weaknesses and highlights the best ways to invest

The 2010s was a dismal decade for Europe. It began with the euro crisis between 2010 and 2015, when sharp recessions and mass unemployment devastated southern Europe; the Covid-19 pandemic has snuffed out the tentative recovery. However, while Italy and Spain languish and France stagnates, Germany, the continent’s powerhouse (it accounts for around 30% of eurozone GDP) proved resilient. Global momentum boosted its export-led economy, helping to ensure that GDP expanded by an average of almost 2% a year between 2009 and 2019, according to the World Bank, compared with an annual 1.5% for the rest of the EU. And Germany looks poised to outperform its neighbours in the next decade too, not least because it is moving beyond its traditional strengths of manufacturing and engineering into new industries. 

A BIG POST-COVID-19 BOUNCE

Germany is deemed to have dealt with Covid-19 better than most developed countries. However, the social distancing and lockdowns mean that its economy hasn’t emerged completely unscathed, with the OECD economic organisation of developed countries projecting that its GDP will fall 8% in 2020. A furlough scheme paying 60% of the salary of workers on zero or reduced hours has not been enough to stop unemployment rising to a five-year high of 6.2%.

Still, Germany has several advantages that will ensure that its economy bounces back more quickly than elsewhere, says Andrew Kenningham of Capital Economics. “Before the virus struck, Germany was growing much faster than other countries in Europe.” It is also much less dependent on consumption and tourism, two areas that have been hit particularly badly by the pandemic and are likely to be the last to recover, even after a vaccine is distributed. By contrast, the German manufacturing sector has experienced much less disruption to production and demand.

“GERMAN FIRMS ARE KNOWN FOR DELIVERING RELIABLE AND REASONABLY PRICED GOODS”

Another reason why Germany should recover relatively quickly is because of its “strong balance sheet”, says Kenningham. Germany is notorious for its puritanical distaste for government spending and debt (it is perhaps not a coincidence that the words for debt and guilt are the same in German). This meant that it went into the crisis with government debt equivalent to around 60% of GDP (compared with 85% for the UK, 98% for France and 138% for Italy). 

While public debt has jumped over the last nine months, previous fiscal rectitude reduces the need for dramatic spending cuts and tax rises now and also provides scope for further support of the economy in 2021. The public sector isn’t the only part of the economy that has been thrifty. German consumers are far less inclined to splurge than their Anglo-Saxon counterparts. Household debt in Germany is worth 54% of GDP, compared with 89% in Britain.

EXPORTS POWER EMERGING MARKETS

German manufacturing is an important engine of economic growth, says Dr Steve Coulter, head of industrial strategy, skills and sustainability at the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change. This is because manufacturing accounts for a large portion of Germany’s exports, which in turn comprise 50% of GDP (compared with 30% of GDP in the UK). What’s more, many of these exports go to the fast-growing Asian economies, especially China. While the market for cars and machine tools, two of Germany’s biggest exports, “virtually dried up overnight” during the first wave of the pandemic, it has quickly recovered.

There is always the risk that German companies may suffer from any move away from globalisation, especially if “Chinese consumers decide to start switching to domestic brands”, says Coulter. Beijing is keen for domestic companies to shed their low-quality, bargain-basement image and start developing premium products, reducing demand for foreign goods. However, this is a bigger problem for the luxury-goods sector, dominated by the likes of France’s LVMH, than for German manufacturers. The reputation of German companies is based on their ability to “deliver quality goods that are both reliable and reasonably priced”.

German manufacturing excels at producing goods that target the “upper-middle part of the market”, aimed at those who want something more than basic quality, but don’t necessarily want to pay luxury prices. While this segment may be less prestigious than goods at the absolute top end of the market, it still leads to “surprisingly high margins” for firms that can supply the emerging middle class with popular products.  Car companies, such as Mercedes and BMW, have been particularly successful in this context.

THE MITTELSTAND: GERMANY’S BACKBONE

A unique feature of the German economy is the extent to which it relies on the Mittelstand. This segment of the economy comprises a vast number of small and medium-sized firms, but also larger companies with a substantial degree of family ownership or influence that distinguishes them from traditional listed or private companies. According to the Deutsche Börse, the German stock-exchange operator, 58% Germany’s workforce is employed in the Mittelstand and it accounts for around 57% of economic output.

One of the main strengths of these firms is their ability to take a long-term view: they “spend a relatively high amount on research and development”, says Joerg Zeuner, chief economist at Union Investment. This reinvestment means that they can punch above their weight when it comes to staying “on the edge of innovation” and “developing new ideas”. They have remained competitive with global rivals in engineering and manufacturing. At the same time, they have  increasingly been moving into new sectors, such  as renewables.

Many people argue that smaller firms will always struggle to take advantage of economies of scale “and it’s certainly true that their relative importance to the German economy has slightly declined over the past few decades”, says Coulter. However, they still have several factors in their favour that bode very well for the future. While they compete fiercely between each other when it comes to selling products, “they are very good at organising collective training in order to ensure high labour productivity”. They also have good relations with their local banks, “which are much more forgiving than those in the UK”. 

BIOTECH: A NEW GROWTH SECTOR

One area that demonstrates the durability of the German model is biotechnology. Germany “has quickly become one of the leading countries in Europe for biotechnology-focused companies”, says Anthony Ginsburg, managing director of GinsGlobal Index Funds. The revenue of the German biotech sector climbed from €3.7bn in 2016 to €4.9bn in 2019. The number of German biotech firms has increased to more than 660, including 23 listed ones, with the workforce rising from 18,000 in 2015 to over 50,000 today.

A key reason for this is the large amount of money, both public and private, invested in research. If you count all universities, colleges and non-academic research laboratories, there are almost 202 research facilities in Germany. The German government is also working hard to make sure that research breakthroughs don’t just stay in the laboratory, but are turned into marketable products. It has created more than 30 biotech hubs to encourage “close collaboration between research institutes, technology parks, regional political players and biotech firms” and they are already starting to make “a big difference”.

Germany’s status as a major player in the biotechnology industry has been cemented by its performance during the Covid-19 crisis. Not only is the vaccine developed by the Mainz firm BioNTech the front runner in the race to be the first to win regulatory approval, but Bosch and Roche have also successfully developed rapid diagnostic tests, with Roche’s antibody test showing a 99.8% accuracy rate. As of last month, there are 97 Covid-19 clinical studies under way in Germany – half of which have reached the trial stage.

THE SERVICES SECTOR IS SLOWLY IMPROVING

German firms may dominate engineering and manufacturing, but there is a general consensus that “the service sector is one of the German economy’s weak spots”, says Peter Dixon, senior economist at Commerzbank. This is partly because the focus  on manufacturing has meant that the sector has  been neglected. 

Rules and regulations on anything from opening hours (good luck shopping on a Sunday) to licensing and permits, some of which date back to medieval times, are another problem. Finally, the government’s determination to balance the budget “has also limited the resources available for digital investment”. However, while “additional structural reform” is still required, [Germany’s] performance is often better than is popularly portrayed”. Pressure from the EU on Germany to open up its service sector to competition – by recognising foreign occupational qualifications, for instance, has worked. The number of foreign degrees acknowledged each year has risen to a record 36,000.

Germany’s financial sector also looks set to benefit from Brexit, in the short term at least. Britain is about to lose its “financial services passport”, which allows financial institutions to sell their products across Europe. This arrangement will be replaced with a weaker regime based on “equivalence”. As a result, says Coulter, “many banks that used to employ 10,000 people in London now typically employ 8,000 in London and 2,000 in… Frankfurt. With the EU “trying to make life difficult for London”, whether a deal is agreed or not, banks are likely to remain cautious. 

A NEW WORKFORCE

Until recently there was concern that Germany’s future growth would be hampered by an ageing workforce. At present the average German woman has 1.57 children. While this is higher than some European countries (Italy’s fertility rate is just 1.34, for instance), it is still far below the replacement rate of 2.1. As a result, Germany’s population is projected to peak in around five years’ time before falling from 83 million to 75 million by 2060. The ratio of elderly and retired people is also set to increase compared with the working-age population, slowing down growth and raising the burden on public services.

“GERMANY’S SERVICE SECTOR HAS BEEN HAMPERED BY RED TAPE; SOME REGULATIONS DATE BACK TO MEDIEVAL TIMES”

The good news is that this trend is being reversed, or at least postponed, by the increased inflow of workers into Germany. While Angela Merkel’s decision in 2015 to let in large number of refugees on humanitarian grounds may have dominated the political debate, the more important story is the “large amount of economic migration into Germany”, says Union Investment’s Joerg Zeuner. Most of this has been from within the EU, “mostly Eastern Europe, but also some migration from Spain and even Greece”. Immigration has helped bolster the fertility rate from a nadir of 1.24 in 1994.

Whatever the origins of the migrants, “they tend to be younger than the average German, which has helped improve the demographic outlook for Germany”, says Zeuner. They also tend to be relatively skilled and in some cases have even helped found new companies.  An excellent example of a company founded by first-and second-generation Turkish immigrants is BioNTech (see profile).

A BUOYANT PROPERTY MARKET

Germany’s strong growth outlook and more favourable demographics are good news for its property market, which has boomed over the last decade. While prices stagnated and even fell in real terms in the first two decades following the fall of the Berlin Wall, they appreciated by 123% between 2009 and 2019, according to Deutsche Bank. 

This has led to a “lot of hand-wringing about property prices”, says Commerzbank’s Peter Dixon.  But while there are “justified concerns” about valuations, “the simple fact is that in an environment of low unemployment and zero interest rates, property looks like a good place to be”.

Of course, a future “exogenous shock” could prompt a “correction”. However, the fact that it has “coped well with the biggest shock in living memory” this year suggests it will continue to boom. Even a reduction in bank lending, unlikely at present, won’t be enough by itself to “trigger a major turnaround”. Some ideas for investing in German property – and other promising areas – are in the box below.

Friday 27 November 2020

How do you achieve "levelling up"?

 27 November 2020

Brexit is an opportunity to level up the rural economy

By  

Even the most diehard eurosceptic accepts that leaving the EU is a risk. But a willingness to adapt to change is perhaps one of the most enduring qualities we have in this country.

In the farming sector, it was difficult to see how meaningful change to the Common Agricultural Policy could ever be achieved. We, at the Country Land and Business Association, argued for decades that the financial support farmers receive should be based on the environmental good they deliver, not just the amount of land they own. It was an idea that was virtually impossible to execute from inside the EU. Now, as we prepare to leave, this is about to be implemented. 

Transitioning from the old system to the new is fraught with danger, and it is vital that Government provides clear guidance and comprehensive support to farmers throughout that transition. Our analysis shows that the average farm will lose up to 50% of the support they have previously received by the time the new ‘public goods’ scheme is fully available in 2024. This risks putting many farms out of business.

It shows with great clarity the trade offs of leaving the EU. Yes, we will have more power to do things our own way – many of which can be done better – but unless we use that power wisely opportunities will be squandered. Brexit has exposed the need for reform so the country works for everyone, and to its credit, the Government realised this and committed to ‘levelling up’ during the election campaign. This promise, however, has largely been forgotten in the fog of Covid-19. Government needs to follow through – and it should do so with the rural economy at its heart.

The economy in the countryside is 16% less productive than the national average. This gap is equivalent to a loss of £43 billion from GDP. It is a fact that is being almost entirely ignored in Whitehall – a problem at any time, but especially when the economy is facing such dire uncertainty. 

Of course, those of us living and working in the countryside must play our part too. This week is Rural Powerhouse Week: a week-long programme of digital events that brings together senior Ministers, government officials, rural economics experts, land managers and entrepreneurs to identify how we can create good new jobs in the countryside, supporting businesses and communities alike. Indeed, as we all seek to ‘build back better’, the particular focus is how we can grow the economy, mitigate climate change and reverse biodiversity decline at the same time.

It is possible. Only 67% of rural areas have access to a good 4G connection, frustrating entrepreneurs and small businesses reliant on connectivity to grow. Rolling out 4G is worth an estimated £75 billion to the UK economy over 10 years. It’s a stubborn problem but it can be fixed. 

Equally, up and down the country we have rural business owners keen to convert disused buildings into office spaces to support modern start-ups. But all too often they are prevented from doing so by a planning system that is outdated and underfunded, stacking the odds against those wishing to invest in their communities. 

One planning application for the redevelopment of a site in a market town required £1million in upfront costs for supporting evidence, and was ultimately refused. A planning application for a plant that converts biomass into energy incurred £300,000 in upfront costs and was also refused – to the detriment of the Government’s own “green” agenda.

We held high hopes for Government’s planning white paper published earlier this year, which was marketed as a new beginning for the planning system in England. But it seemed the Government was more interested in treating the countryside as a museum, limiting any development at all, rather than as a modern economy with potential for growth and jobs.

A simpler tax system would help businesses wishing to diversify, to invest in skills to support job creation in local areas. The creation of meaningful environmental markets would allow landowners to build businesses that mitigate climate change and encourage biodiversity recovery.

There is no time to lose. The Government needs to reshape the agenda in 2021 to unleash the potential of the rural economy. But to do that it can’t be business as usual. The revolution that is needed in the countryside will not come from one government department, but several – who must learn to work better with one another.

The post-EU fresh start is nearly upon us. And if Government is serious about making the UK a country that works for everyone – including those in the countryside – then it needs to prove it, quickly.

Click here to subscribe to our daily briefing – the best pieces from CapX and across the web.

Thursday 12 November 2020

A look at what is happening behind UK data

Is the UK's recovery really lagging other countries?

Economists urge caution on growth figures ahead of a tough fourth quarter

It’s rare that a record economic expansion can be described as a “disappointment” but Covid-19 has sent GDP figures careering literally off the charts.

Third-quarter growth figures pointed to an unmatched 15.5pc surge in GDP compared to the previous three months, rebounding from the record collapse during lockdown.

However, the slightly weaker-than-expected rise meant that output is still 9.7pc lower compared to the end of 2019, suggesting that the UK’s recovery is lagging well behind the US and eurozone economies. 

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) says that the gap between third quarter GDP and 2019 levels is twice as large as the shortfall in Italy, Germany and France, and almost three times the 3.5pc drop in the US. That may not tell the full story, however.

Some City economists warned the UK economy was losing momentum rapidly before the second lockdown. But others said the gloomy prognosis was derived from a statistical oddity. So what is really going on under the bonnet of the UK economy?